Politics lite: shrunken conventions
Junkies who live for politics probably 
mourn the decision of ABC, CBS and NBC television to abandon gavel-to-gavel 
coverage and allot only three hours total each to the presidential nominating 
conventions.
The end to saturation coverage was 
inevitable. Conventions had become scripted entertainment extravaganzas with 
little or no suspense that audiences increasingly shunned and thus became risky 
business for TV. A third-rate murder trial draws more coverage and bigger 
audiences.
Cliff-hanging surprises on who would be 
the convention nominees vanished with primaries that pick party choices weeks 
ahead of conventions.
No heart-stoppers either about party 
platforms: They’re hammered out by platform committees well ahead of 
conventions. A few maverick state delegates are allowed to object for show, but 
their efforts are futile.
Americans who prefer sound bites no longer 
have the patience for dreary and droning convention speeches, for tiresome polls 
of delegates on credentials issues and for orchestrated floor demonstrations 
that erupt at the mention of an obscure politician’s name. 
(Of course, anything resembling terrorism 
at either convention could change TV’s role in an instant.)
Shrunken TV coverage doesn’t mean plenty 
of news isn’t available elsewhere.
When Democrats convene on Monday in Boston 
and Republicans in New York on Aug. 30, C-SPAN and other cable networks will be 
on duty. (For owners with special cable equipment, ABC television will broadcast 
convention news constantly on normally hidden digital subchannels.)
And for the first time, the new Internet 
rage, bloggers, will be credentialed to provide their own irreverent, sarcastic 
perspective online about the conventions.
For those still reading newspapers, 
millions of words will flow out of Boston and New York to the pages of the 
country’s dailies and weekly magazines. Late night network comedians will also 
have their edgy and politically incorrect takes on the convention news, too.
Shrinking audiences that led to shrunken 
convention TV coverage parallel the shrinking turnout of voters in presidential 
elections. 
Over the last 70 years, the largest 
turnout was in 1960, at 62.8 percent of voters, for the race between John 
Kennedy and Richard Nixon, while the lowest was in 1996 in the three-way race 
between Democrat Bill Clinton, Republican Bob Dole and Independent Ross Perot at 
49 percent.
Not only do millions of Americans who’re 
eligible not register to vote, but those who do register turn out in dismaying 
low numbers. 
Low registration of eligible voters plus 
low turnout means a citizen minority decides who leads American government.