Ketchum budget 
out of whack
The tail is wagging the dog in Ketchum 
City Hall.
The mayor and city council annually 
explain why the city can’t complete sidewalks, contribute to a valley-wide bus 
system, improve dangerous city intersections, and acquire land for parking, snow 
storage or affordable community housing. This year, too, they will recite a 
litany that has become all too familiar.
Yet, the city is having no problem funding 
whopping salary increases for department heads, and platinum health care, 
dental, disability and retirement benefits for all city employees.
In deliberations over the past six weeks, 
the mayor and city council haven’t flinched at proposed salary increases for 
city department heads that range from 18 percent to 30 percent. They haven’t 
blinked at proposed staffing increases. And, they are on track to approve a 
budget that contains benefit increases of more than 33 percent.
The increases are startling in a year in 
which the increase in the national consumer price index is running near 2.4 
percent and local option tax revenues are running 5.2 percent below last year.
Blaine County’s cost of living is high 
relative to other areas, and Ketchum has become sensitive to that. But this 
high?
Last year, the city offered a firm 
handshake, congratulations and going-away gifts to its retiring city 
administrator, fire chief and police chief. Then it hired replacements at 
salaries the long-time employees only dreamed of.
Some examples:
The city administrator’s salary is set to 
go up next year to $130,224, an increase of $10,224 or 8 percent. The 
administrator replaced a retiring official last year whose salary was in the 
$80,000 range.
The planning director is slated to be paid 
$72,180, an 18 percent increase of $10,896.
The police chief’s salary is slated to go 
up to $89,580, a 19 percent increase of $14,200.
The fire chief’s salary is budgeted at 
$88,608, a 30 percent increase of $20,028.
The street department superintendent’s 
salary is listed at $69,312, a 20 percent increase of $11,334.
In addition to the good salaries—even in 
expensive Blaine County—the city pays for all but a very small percentage of the 
cost of medical insurance for city workers and their families. It covers those 
costs for the mayor and members of the city council as well. It pays for dental 
and disability insurance, and offers a lucrative retirement plan through the 
state.
In real terms, the health benefits and 
additional insurance and contributions to the retirement program amount to an 
average of an additional 51 percent of salary.
In other words, for every $10,000 in 
salary, city workers bring home an additional $5,100 a year is in benefits.
The city insures 79 employees, 41 spouses 
and 20 children.
The city’s health insurance costs are 
projected to increase 27% next year and total $1.1 million. That’s a handsome 
hunk of the city’s $7.8 million budget. Other benefits are slated to increase 11 
percent, or $88,762.
Of its total budget, the city will pay 
$4.1 million for salaries and benefits.
The city’s medical insurance coverage is 
every employer and employee’s dream. It pays 100 percent for participating 
physician services, 90 percent of hospital expenses, carries a $200 deductible 
and limits out-of-pocket expenses to $1,333 per person.
Sweet. Much sweeter than the majority of 
employers in Ketchum and Blaine County can provide.
How will the city pay for its higher 
salaries and benefits next year? By cutting building and plant improvements, 
foregoing property acquisitions and shoving the problem forward into next year 
by agreeing to spend $500,000 more than it expects to take in next year.
Ouch.
The budget is out of whack. Yet, the city 
is on track to approve the proposed budget in a hearing on Monday at 5:30.
Last week the city council belatedly set 
up a committee to take a look at what the city should do to bring expenses in 
line over the coming year. Yet, the coming year may be too late if the city 
spends as planned.
There’s no question the city’s hardworking 
employees should be paid well, or that the city must offer competitive 
compensation packages to attract talent.
However, the city needs to strike a 
balance between salaries and benefits, and services and infrastructure.
It’s time the city came into the real 
world.
It’s time the mayor explained the "wisdom" 
of absorbing double-digit salary and benefit increases without question and 
without greater participation by city workers.
It’s time the city council explains why it 
is in the city’s interest to cut infrastructure improvements in order to fund 
city jobs at the levels called for in the budget.
It’s time someone in leadership gets a 
grip on the tail that’s wagging this dog.