Friday, September 27, 2013

Affordable housing at any cost


By BEN WORST


    The Ketchum Urban Renewal Agency has been working diligently to hide its latest 24-unit rental project from the public and for good reason.
    In 2006, the URA paid $2.25 million for 211 Washington St., intending to construct underground parking with affordable housing above it on that lot and on the adjacent city-owned parking lot. The URA paid perhaps 20 percent above fair market value for the opportunity to develop both lots in conjunction. In April, 2011, with some creative bookkeeping, the URA “transferred” $640,000 taken from the city’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund that it had spent on the Starbucks lot to 211 Washington. According to its own official documents, the URA has invested more than $3 million in 211 Washington. Now the URA is attempting to exchange 211 Washington for two parcels owned by the Higgins group on Second Avenue between 6th and 7th streets for its project.
    Idaho Code Section 50-2011 requires that the URA receive fair value in the exchange; however, the URA’s appraisal values the two Higgins parcels combined at $616,500 while valuing 211 Washington at $1,045,000. Hardly fair value. Worse yet, the URA is abandoning its $3 million investment in 211 Washington along with the opportunity to provide much-needed parking downtown. The URA has never explained why it hasn’t graded 211 Washington for inexpensive surface parking until it has enough money to build the underground garage.
    The Higgins parcels are actually a good location for affordable housing. My objection is to the proposed radical upzone that would result in density incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood. If the Higgins group applied for a building permit today, it would not be allowed to build anything on its Tourist Zone parcel because that parcel fails to meet minimum lot-size requirements. The group would only be allowed to build three or four dwellings on its General Residential-Low Density parcel. The URA is moving from four dwellings to 24 dwellings.
    Needless to say, the URA has tried to hide this project from the public. The URA considered the land exchange application and appraisals behind closed doors on July 15, 2013. On the Friday before Labor Day weekend, the URA amended its meeting agenda to add consideration of the exchange at its meeting three days later. Recall that the city performed the same stunt when it attempted to give money to ARCH for the Evergreen project. To date, no one at the URA has accepted responsibility for that flagrant attempt to hide its behavior. Until I forced the issue, the URA never identified the Higgins parcels as the target of its exchange. When the URA begrudgingly accepted public comment, it limited that comment to two minutes per person and
denied half of the attendees any
opportunity to speak at all.
    Ketchum’s citizens need to take a stand for good government because the appointed commissioners on the URA will not. The URA must conduct the public’s business in public. While the process to date may be legal, it has not been ethical and doesn’t even approach best practices. Lack of transparency and excluding the public from the decision-making process cause turmoil and division in the community. It tells the rest of the world that Ketchum is corrupt and incompetent. That’s bad for business.


Ben Worst, an attorney, lives in Ketchum.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2020 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.