Be careful where,
you put that comma.
Commentary by BETTY BELL
You’d think I’d be long past the
days of worrying about whether to put in a comma here or take one out
there, but since I got the job of backing up the real proofreader here
at the Express, a man often smitten with an irresistible urge to get
up-close and personal with mountains far away, the worry’s back. The
correct placement of the comma and its combinations—the period, the
semicolon and the colon—is once again giving me fits. There are hard and
fast punctuation commandments set forth in many punctuation bibles, but
for every commandment there seems to be a "yeahbut." Punctuation rules
are like those congressional bills with so many riders that the
meaning’s buried.
I used to read to get caught up in
the story, but I don’t give a whit about the story line now. Now I zero
in on the spelling ... on the punctuation ... on the typos. The trouble
is, I’m in way over my head, and all because of circumstances beyond my
control. When I was in grade school our family moved so often we should
have been issued gypsy green cards. Almost every year I checked out of
one Catholic school and into another, and every one of those moves
seemed timed to miss the crucial sessions on the stuff and substance
that make up a sentence, stuff then taught through diagramming--a
nightmare method wherein Sister Mary Fidelis, or Sister Mary Magdalene,
or Sister Whoever—one as terrifying as the other—would, in perfect
Palmer-method script, write a book-length sentence on the blackboard,
turn her laser look to the class, and hand the chalk to the victim
chosen to diagram it. With slashes and sub-slashes all over the board,
the chosen one would lay out every word so that the mystery of how the
whole thing was put together was revealed. I never remember a classmate
who couldn’t march to the board and with almost manic glee rip that
sentence apart and bare its innards for all the enlightened to
see—meaning for all to see but me.
Can you imagine my terror? Sitting
there as small as I could make myself, dreading the terrible moment when
Sister would hand me the chalk and send me to the board where I’d clinch
forever the title Dumbbell Queen.
I know in my very bones that the
lucky kids who learned to diagram never forgot it. I bet that today,
even Glen Mitchell, the meanest, toughest kid of any school ever, could
swagger to the blackboard and diagram a sentence that would not only
bare its skeleton but also repair every errant participle that dared to
dangle.
I never did get called on, a
blessing surely attributable to my gypsy green card; surely, the next
day when I’d have been singled out was the very day I transferred to my
next school.
There’s much talk about leaving no
child behind, but if schools were closed today because kids couldn’t
diagram sentences, it’d be voucher-time big-time. Diagramming fell from
favor about the time nuns quit wearing their own unique burkas, and the
parts of speech and punctuation are taught in a much kinder and gentler
way now. But I think that the trauma of the
blackboard-center-stage-diagram-method was the best way—no contest—to
make grammar lessons stick.
These days, when I proofread, I’m
cheered when I come upon the whimsical punctuation marks—the exclamation
point and dash, and those rat-tailed dot variations—the semicolon and
colon. There’s a lot of room for creative thinking with the whimsical
marks. The exclamation point, for instance, is so totally personal—no
hard and fast rule governs their use. One throws one in when it suits
one! I don’t think a proofreader dare shoulder the responsibility of
determining whether or not a statement is worthy of the exclamation
mark! And the dash—good heavens—personally, I’d never get by if I
couldn’t use one—the dash, that is—as often as the mood strikes me. The
semicolon and colon seem naturally to be sparingly used. I think a
writer uses a semicolon or colon only when she’s in one of her rare and
fleeting states of exuberance—or maybe at the peak of her caffeine high.
Suddenly and confidently she’ll hit the semicolon key, and lo, it is
precisely the right thing to do. I wouldn’t change a semicolon for the
world, but, no question about it, I’m still insecure with commas. I’ve
figured out a test that seems to work for me: If I can read the sentence
through with fluidity and ease, if I can stay oblivious to the commas,
or lack thereof, then surely all is well. I do believe that all writers
harbor extremely possessive feelings about their commas, and they find
it ever-so-hard to accept even an ever-so-slight tinkering.
Every once in awhile, however, I
do come across a sentence that cries out for help no matter whom I might
offend. Here’s one: The president said Kerry should swap all his swagger
for a dollop of wisdom.
Even a gypsy girl on the road all
through Grammar 101 knows it’s gotta read: The President, said Kerry,
should swap all his swagger for a dollop of wisdom.
Ah—such truth and revelation in
proper punctuation.