City officials
slam proposed TDR ordinance
Criticism
prompted by changes to map
By GREG
MOORE
Express Staff Writer
Blaine
County’s proposed transfer-of-development-rights program took a hard
hit Monday when Bellevue and Hailey officials accused the county of
trampling on their planning authority.
The
officials’ charges, leveled during a county commission meeting, were
prompted by recent revisions to the proposed program that would
designate "receiving areas" adjacent to the two towns, rather
than in Agricultural-zoned areas farther south.
The
meeting was set with the intention of possibly passing an ordinance.
However, that possibility was eliminated at the meeting’s outset when
it was determined that there had been insufficient legal notice made of
the meeting.
The
intent of a TDR program is to preserve agriculture in the south county
by giving farmers and ranchers a means to profit from their properties’
increasing value without selling it outright. Instead, they could sell
development rights, which would be transferred to designated receiving
areas. Density allowances in those areas would increase beyond that
allowed by zoning.
Under the
original proposal created by a citizens’ advisory board, both sending
and receiving areas were in the A-20 zone, well south of Bellevue. That
changed during a June 24 commissioners’ meeting under an agenda item
designated "planning and zoning discussion." At that time, the
commissioners changed the proposed receiving areas to five new
locations:
· Croy
Canyon, west of Hailey
·
Quigley Canyon, east of Hailey.
·
Land zoned R-2 from Hailey north to the mouth of Indian Creek.
·
Land zoned R-5 from Friedman Memorial Airport south to the
Bellevue city limits, and east of the Big Wood River’s flood plain.
·
A triangular area from the Bellevue city limits south to Glendale
Road, containing land zoned R-5.
Commissioner
Dennis Wright said the changes were motivated by the county’s
comprehensive plan, which encourages development close to towns.
Even so,
city officials said they felt left out of the process.
"I
have a real problem with the county planning our future, and I get the
sense that you don’t think Bellevue is capable of planning its
future," said Bellevue Mayor John Barton.
The mayor
requested that the county refrain from any more planning around Bellevue
until the city has an area-of-city-impact agreement in place.
Barton
charged that under the new proposal, residents of Bellevue and Hailey
would suffer to benefit a few large landowners near Silver Creek.
"There
are some 10,000 constituents who will be dramatically affected by this
proposal," he said.
Barton’s
sentiments were echoed by two Bellevue City Council members and Hailey
Planning Director Kathy Grotto, as well as by south-county rancher Katie
Breckenridge.
"I
sense very strongly that we slam-dunked the cities," Breckenridge
said. "I think we’re going against everything we did on the
(citizens’) committee."
Hailey
resident Bill Hughes contended that the new plan simply exchanges
"splattering the south valley for increasing sprawl around Hailey
and Bellevue."
The new
plan was supported by citizens’ advisory board member Larry Schoen and
Blaine County Citizens for Smart Growth representative Doug Werth, who
said it more closely conforms with the TDR program’s intent than did
the old map. However, both acknowledged that the commissioners may have
moved too quickly by designating the area between Hailey and Bellevue as
a receiving area before an area-of-city-impact agreement is completed
there.
Commissioner
Sarah Michael contended that designation of those areas might jump-start
stalled negotiations to complete an agreement. However, she suggested
that the proposed receiving area between Hailey and Bellevue be
temporarily deleted from the map.
Commission
Chair May Ann Mix scheduled an "informal work session" on
Sept. 25 for Bellevue officials to come in with proposed
area-of-city-impact boundaries.