Effectiveness of airport site selection
process challenged
Citizen advisory committee’s meeting
turns testy
By PAT MURPHY
Express Staff Writer
For most of the scheduled two hours of
their second monthly meeting Tuesday night, members of the Friedman Memorial
Airport citizens site selection advisory committee seemed content to quietly
absorb a wide-ranging technical and economic briefing on why a new airport may
be needed for the Wood River Valley.
But almost at the moment of adjournment at
7:30 p.m., the meeting turned testy and continued for another half-hour.
It began when former Ketchum city
councilman Maurice Charlat blurted out:
"We’re operating as an audience," he said
impatiently, inferring the committee lacked any real meaning or influence. "I
don’t know why we’re here. Last thing you want is individual comments," he said,
directing his comments at airport officials.
That prompted member Wally Huffman,
general manager of the Sun Valley Resort who was sitting beside Charlat, to
chime in, saying he believed it "unrealistic" and "nothing short of a miracle to
send a recommendation to the (Friedman Memorial Airport) board" for a new
airport site.
"I don’t think we’re going to reach a
consensus" on a proposed new airport site, he said. Huffman also claimed that
the committee of 25 principal members and 25 alternates would "walk out of here
in 18 months with divergent views."
Airport officials--manager Rick Baird,
attorney Barry Luboviski and consultant Charles Sudby--sought to reassure
Charlat and Huffman that the group could chart its own course, such as
establishing subcommittees if it wished, and could render final recommendations
representing various points of view on where and if a new airport should be
built.
Huffman cleared the air by jesting that
"I’m still struggling to find a (new airport) site between Hailey and Ketchum"
that would be closer to Sun Valley’s resort facilities. The room erupted in
laughter.
Clearly, sentiments still exist for
maintaining the present airport and spending whatever is necessary to bring it
into compliance with Federal Aviation Administration safety standards as well as
prepare for a new generation of faster, larger aircraft now denied use of
Friedman.
Friedman is classified as a C-III
facility, but currently only in compliance with B-III standards. A major
improvement program costing $16.3 million ($14.6 million from the FAA) is under
way to catch up to standards.
The classification is computed on
operating characteristics of aircraft using a field.
As airport manager Baird explained to the
group, the FAA has never said the present field must be abandoned, only that it
comply with standards and anticipate needs of the future.
The costs would not only be high in
dollars, but also in community dislocation.
To make Friedman safe and usable for years
to come, the terminal would need to be more than doubled in size, exotic landing
and takeoff navigation systems installed, large new aircraft parking aprons
built, the runway extended from 6,952 feet to 7,500 feet, and taxiways relocated
farther from the single runway, which would require moving Highway 75 farther
east and condemnation of private property.
Even if preserving the present field were
feasible, Baird explained, it might not be acceptable to the community, whose
complaints about noise was one reason the search for a new site was triggered.
Realtor Dick Fenton wondered whether the
present runway could simply be rebuilt farther south on land acquired by the
authority and city of Hailey. But Baird pointed out such a proposed move would
be tantamount to building a new airport—requiring the same lengthy studies
required of a new airport at some distant site as well as major land
acquisition.
Baird also pointed out that any site
within the Wood River Valley would still have operational limitations because of
high terrain surrounding the area that narrows the approach and departure path
for aircraft, and is partly responsible for diverting airline flights to Twin
Falls during low ceiling periods in winter.
A minor rub developed during the meeting
when Huffman asked that minutes be taken at each meeting and a transcript
provided committee members later. He said "as far as my comments, I would like
to have them verbatim."
After seeming to disagree they could be
provided, Baird said some sort of summary could be arranged.
Huffman also was informed that the
airport’s governing board had rejected his suggestion that delegates from Twin
Falls and Jerome counties be included on the committee.
He said he would "register my
dissatisfaction" with that decision.
Baird and airport authority chair Mary Ann
Mix, who was attending as an observer, explained that Camas and Lincoln
counties, which abut Blaine County, are included because of their proximity and
the possibility a proposed site will be recommended in their boundaries;
whereas, Twin Falls and Jerome are too distant to meet the needs of Blaine
County.
Professional meeting facilitator Mike
Pepper, of Twin Falls, came under criticism briefly after saying he hoped that
if committee members talked to news media they would be "factual." Some members
thought Pepper was attempting to muzzle them.
Not so, he said, and apologized.