Demanding agenda forecast for
airport site selection panel
Large committee has big job
ahead
By PAT MURPHY
Express Staff Writer
There may be more truth than
exaggeration in Friedman Memorial Airport Authority member Martha
Burke’s observation Tuesday night about the new citizens airport site
selection advisory committee.
With 42 principal members and
alternatives signed up as members, Burke said wryly that the committee
"is going to be very cumbersome."
That reality effectively put an
end to a suggestion from Dr. Ron Fairfax, an authority member as well as
an aircraft owner, that two more members without connections to any
organization be added to the group. The prospect of several dozen
committee members expressing views and meetings extending for hours
ended discussion of Fairfax’s proposal.
The committee will hold its first
meeting at 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, May 25, in the meeting room of the Old
Blaine County Courthouse.
Airport manager Rick Baird said
Tuesday at the board’s monthly meeting that the first full committee
meeting would be for organizational purposes. At its June meeting, the
committee will be given documents outlining the scope of their studies,
schedule of meetings and briefings on why a new airport may need to be
built.
However, once routine discussion
of the committee and its size was under way, Baird said costs "might be
overwhelming" if the number of scheduled meetings over the next 18
months to two years isn’t scaled back and the number of appearances by
the airport’s consultants isn’t reduced.
Tom Schnetzer, a consultant with
Mead & Hunt, and Charles Sundby, of consultants Toothman-Orton, both
agreed they need not attend each of the committee’s meetings.
Baird said initially the committee
was scheduled for 44 meetings. But he now believes that might not be
necessary nor feasible.
The airport authority has been
emphatic in stressing public participation in decisions involving the
possibility of a new airport, which could cost upward of $100 million,
possibly be four times the size of the current Friedman Memorial and be
located at a distant site outside of the Wood River Valley’s restrictive
terrain.
Stiff requirements of the Federal
Aviation Administration have created a demanding agenda for the
committee as well as the airport staff and consultants.
Dozens of elements involved in
finding a possible site for a new airport must be studied and weighed,
including impact on environment and wildlife, transportation
accessibility, climate that could affect airport operations, effect on
nearby communities and site appeal to air carriers and other users.
The launching of the study
prompted airport attorney Barry Luboviski to recommend that the board
not make any new long-term contractual commitments at the present
airport, such as hangar leases. He said the authority could be
vulnerable to legal actions if the commitments had to be abandoned or
altered because of a new airport being constructed.
In other authority business:
- Manager Baird said that
upgrading of the FAA’s Federal Aviation Regulation Part 139 is
imposing stiffer new standards for airport firefighting and rescue
services. But he said he believes Friedman’s emergency facilities,
equipment and personnel easily will comply.
- Contracts for architectural
services for airport improvements have been negotiated for passenger
terminal modifications, design of a new control tower and improvements
to the maintenance building at a total cost of $155,623.
- Baird will present a proposed
fiscal 2005 budget at the June meeting.
- Sun Valley Aviation will hold a
groundbreaking for its new office and hangar on the west side of the
airport at 4 p.m., May 26.
- Using a new aerial photo of the
airport taken in the last week of April, consultant Sundby briefed
authority members on the new enlarged parking area on the west side of
the terminal and the new access road.