Breast cancer
research analyzed
Annual symposium highlights
advances
By DANA DUGAN
Express Staff Writer
A flurry of medically and
scientifically astute questions were fired at a panel on breast cancer
research last week in Sun Valley, dismissing the notion that Q & A
sessions with doctors are merely an effective way to get free advice.
Hosted by Expedition Inspiration,
the Eighth Annual Laura Evans Memorial Breast Cancer Symposium was held
Feb. 25 through Feb. 29. The conference is a meeting of research and
clinical physicians specializing in breast cancer research.
Attending the annual Breast
Cancer Symposium in Sun Valley are Drs. Julie Gralow, Max Wicha and
Chris Benz. The physicians and their colleagues spent four days together
in workshops sharing their unpublished work. Courtesy photo
An open forum was held in the
Limelight Room of the Sun Valley Inn Thursday, Feb. 29.
Because the theme this year was
"Breast Cancer: Exciting Advances in Breast Cancer Treatment," the
majority of the discussions at the symposium covered drugs, efficacy,
clinical trials and advances.
The news out of the symposium was
promising. Clinical trials are rewarding, old drugs are being used in
new ways and only 18 percent of breast cancer patients die these days.
The symposium was attended by
featured speakers and members of the EI Medical Advisory Board: EI
Scientific Advisor and Chair Dr. Marc Lippman of the University of
Michigan Health System; Dr. Julie Gralow of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer
Research Center; Dr. Angela DeMichele of the University of Pennsylvania
Abramson Cancer Center; and Dr. Robert Vestal of Boise’s Clinical
Pharmacology Consulting.
Other attendees included Dr. Chris
Benz of the Buck Institute for Age Research; Dr. Arul Chinnaiyan of the
University of Michigan; Dr. David Flockhart of the Indiana University
Cancer Center; Dr. Adrian Harris of Churchill Hospital of Oxford
University, England; Dr. Cliff Hudis of Memorial Sloane Kettering; Dr.
Kent Osborne of Baylor College of Medicine; Dr. George Sledge of Indian
University Cancer Center; Dr. Laura Van’t Veer of The Netherlands Cancer
Institute and Dr. Max Wicha of the University of Michigan Comprehensive
Cancer Center. Dr. Michael Press of the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer
Center was in attendance and was named as a new EI board member.
The doctors all have research
specialties, including genetic, stem cell, prevention and relapse,
patient as host, genomics and protonics, molecular biology, age and
pharmaceuticals.
"These are wonderful meetings,"
Lippman said, "You get eccentric and intelligent people in a room
together and things happen."
Basically, cancer cells do not die
like other cells. "We want to encourage the cancer cells to jump off a
cliff," Lippman said. "We are rapidly moving away from the idea that
cancer is defined by where it comes from. It’ll soon be one of the least
useful things to know. Instead we follow its pathways so that we can get
in its face."
Ways in which researchers are
gaining on cancer are by using new targeted therapies. "It’s clear
breast cancer is a group that needs to be treated separately," Lippman
said.
Various drugs seem to work for
some people but not on others, Hudis said. "Its going to take tremendous
collaboration, which is why this meeting is so important to so many of
us. We have to redefine breast cancer into subtexts, and find drugs that
work for the patients."
With unconcealed satisfaction, the
panel revealed that the drug, Avastin, the first drug to battle cancers
by blocking their blood supply, had been approved that day by the FDA
for colorectal cancer. It works by shutting off new blood vessel growth.
Without that blood supply, solid tumors cannot grow. It is expected that
Avastin, manufactured by Genentech, can be effective when used on breast
cancer patients. In June of next year the "trial may be done and we’ll
know whether it works on recurrent breast cancer," Osborne said.
The importance of testing and
screening were reiterated several times during the two-hour open forum.
Mammograms and breast exams are considered pretty good tools, Gralow
said. But MRIs and ultra sounds "should be considered. Insurance is
approving this for some high risk patients."
Clinical trial patients get the
best care possible and are not treated like guinea pigs. But there are
not enough doctors willing to do trials either from lack of knowledge,
patient ignorance or funding issues, Lippman said.
"If you’re only looking at 95
percent of an issue you’re ignoring the fraction that may be important.
Why are stem cells so important? Because we can isolate these cells from
the whole tumor. Through trials and revisiting drugs that have been
around for years, we get better therapy and get smarter about it," he
added.
For instance, researchers have
learned that giving more chemotherapy doesn’t seem to work.
Instead, "If we give the right
dose more often, it increases the effectiveness of the chemo," Hudis
said. "Frequency and size can impact effectiveness. We learned this in
dose trials where we’re tweaking the chemo."
Also it seems that tamoxifin, a
widely prescribed drug that has been around for many years, doesn’t work
well when used at the same time as chemotherapy. Instead, the drugs are
more effective when used sequentially. The drug Aromotase is now being
considered as an early stage or prevention drug for people who screen
positive for the cancer gene: BRCA 1 and BRCA 2.
This gene is very uncommon,
Osborne said. "The majority are just bad genes, not necessarily from
parents but are often mutated genes."
All the physicians agreed that
patients should ask that their doctors participate in clinical studies.
Every doctor in the U.S. can participate. Only four percent of
oncologists are currently participating.
"We’ll get to prevent it someday
instead of just treat it," Hudis said.