Sun Villas given
new life—again
P&Z allows redesign of unpopular
project
By GREGORY FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
Sun Valley Planning and Zoning
commissioners this week called for a redesign of the proposed 97-unit Sun Villas
project, minutes after they stood poised to deny approval of the controversial
application.
Barry Luboviski, an attorney
representing the residents of the Sunburst and Village condominium complexes,
urges Sun Valley P&Z commissioners to deny approval of the proposed Sun Villas
project. Looking on are commissioners Phil Usher, left, Nils Ribi and Virginia
Egger, center, and Ken Herich, right. Express photo by Willy Cook
At the close of an epic five-hour hearing
Tuesday, Jan. 27, P&Z commissioners voted unanimously to review and revise the
project plans at a public workshop with Sun Villas architects and
representatives.
The decision came after Commissioner Nils
Ribi issued two separate motions to recommend to the Sun Valley City Council
that it deny approval of an application to subdivide the project site into four
parcels.
Ribi said he believes the project is not
in accordance with the city’s codes and would be "out of proportion" with
surrounding properties because of its bulk and mass.
However, despite the fact that the
majority of Ribi’s fellow commissioners indicated they disapproved of various
elements of the project, both motions failed.
At issue is a revised plan by New York
City-based Blackacre Capital Management to construct four multi-story
residential buildings on the so-called "Sunshine Parcel" in central Elkhorn.
The project site—a vacant 4.26-acre
commercial-zoned parcel—is located immediately north of the former Elkhorn
Resort.
The Sun Villas project has been under
review by the city for approximately 1.5 years.
Blackacre in 2002 first proposed a
111-unit Sun Villas development, which was eventually reduced to 105 units
before it was rejected by the P&Z in April 2003.
After Sun Villas representatives appealed
the P&Z decision to the Sun Valley City Council, that panel voted unanimously in
June 2003 to remand the development proposal back to the P&Z—despite numerous
objections from Elkhorn residents.
Similar to the original application for
Sun Villas, the revised application proposes four multi-story buildings with
underground parking, each of which would be located on a subdivided lot
approximately one acre in size.
In the latest revision of the plans, the
project was downsized to include 97 units. Half of the units would be sold at
market rates, while half would be offered as fractional-ownership units. No
residences would be offered as community housing units.
Project planners have proposed that the
two buildings on the south end of the site reach heights of approximately 53
feet and 55 feet respectively.
Two buildings on the north end of the
parcel would respectively reach heights of approximately 64 feet and 60 feet.
Numerous neighbors of the project site
spoke out against the revised Sun Villas plan Tuesday.
Barry Luboviski, an attorney representing
the residents of the neighboring Sunburst and Village condominium complexes,
urged commissioners to reject the project. He said the development would block
neighbors’ views and sunlight.
"This project shouldn’t have another
go-around," he said. "It should be turned down."
Sun Valley resident Milt Adam said the
project was too massive for the proposed site.
"This is the equivalent of two Sun Valley
Lodges put into this area," he said. "It’s an insult to the homeowners and the
people who live in and around there."
Despite the testimony, commissioners—three
of whom were appointed earlier this month—agreed that it would be preferable to
allow project representatives to alter the designs to lessen the development’s
negative impacts.
Commissioner Ken Herich said he supports
the project.
Project attorney Evan Robertson had
suggested to city officials and the P&Z that his group would challenge an
unfavorable decision.
The P&Z did not establish a date for the
forthcoming workshop.