Neighbors oppose replat of Birdwood
subdivision
Hailey P&Z continues application
By MATT FURBER
Express Staff Writer
Ceder Bend and Birdwood neighbors spoke in
opposition to an application by John Bulotti for a replat of lot 15, block 1 of
the Birdwood Subdivision at the Monday, Nov. 3, meeting of the Hailey Planning
and Zoning Commission.
The application would split lot 15 into
four lots of approximately half an acre each, all served by the same, private
driveway. The neighborhoods are in the Della View floodplain located near the
Big Wood River in southwest Hailey.
Neighbors voiced concerns that the
covenants, conditions and restrictions agreed upon by the Birdwood neighborhood
association would be violated by the approval of the Bulotti subdivision. Other
objections to the proposed subdivision included concerns that the plan was in
conflict with the comprehensive plan because it impacts the existing
neighborhood and that the plan includes a private driveway that will be wider
than the adjacent Silver Star Drive.
Galena Engineering’s Brian Yeager,
representing the developer, opened the hearing explaining that the proposed
development was in compliance with the city’s subdivision ordinances.
"We are sympathetic to neighbors
concerns," Yeager said. But he and the applicant were interested in exploring
the application with the commission anyway.
Objections of neighbors did not hang on
whether the developers plans were in conformance with subdivision ordinances,
but rather with the CC&Rs, which are a records kept with the county recorder and
are not rules the city governs.
Several neighbors explained that when they
purchased property in the neighborhood they had the expectation from the CC&Rs
that only one home would be built on lot 15 and asked the commission to deny the
application accordingly.
However, CC&Rs are not a matter for the
Hailey Planning and Zoning Commission to consider, said Hailey City Attorney Ned
Williamson. "The commission is obliged to process this application ... if there
is a violation of the CC&Rs that is something to be addressed in district
court."
The neighborhood debates aside, the
proposal before the commission is not a conventional subdivision proposal
because the lot in question-- being in the flood plain--requires a flood hazard
permit before a development can go forward.
Bulotti does have a flood hazard permit
that is in conjunction with the building permit he has for the home he is
currently building on a portion of lot 15. But, a flood hazard permit is
different for a subdivision development. The ordinance passed by the city last
spring requires that both city staff and P&Z work together to consider issuing
the permits for subdivisions in the flood plain. The city alone can provide
flood hazard permits in conjunction with building permits for single homes.
The commission decided to continue the
Bulotti application until an undetermined date to give the commission an
opportunity to consider public opinion, a flood hazard permit for the
subdivision and whether CC&Rs can be considered by the commission as they apply
to questions about density standards.
"If (CC&Rs) relate to a specific standard
you can look at it," Williamson said. "I can’t see where it relates ...
Neighbors have a right to proceed in court."
Williamson recommended that the commission
look at the history of the adjacent Cedar Bend subdivision for guidance in how
to proceed with Bulotti’s application. In that case, the city made the developer
include extra measures to mitigate impacts on the environmentally sensitive
area.