New airport?
Lost lifestyle?
Whoa!
Before the Wood River Valley gets caught
up in frenzied talk of a large new airport at some distant site, and fantasies
of a business boom cloud the judgment of policymakers, the entire community must
ponder the full range of consequences.
Not just the $100 million cost mentioned
by the Friedman Memorial Airport Authority, but other minuses that come with
galloping growth.
The principal objective of a new airport
would be to create a larger facility of possibly 1,200 acres versus the present
200-some acres, probably with two runways. The airport would be capable of
handling large airline jets to increase the volume of passenger traffic into the
valley from more distant cities and with room enough for satellite businesses
and industry.
If we correctly sense the airport board’s
sympathies, the present Friedman Memorial Airport might also be retained
simultaneously for general aviation and corporate jet traffic as well as small
non-jet airliners.
Now, what would be the impact on the Wood
River Valley of a new airport perhaps six times the size of Friedman Memorial,
even if built 20 miles or more south?
Check them off with a shudder.
Increased ground transportation between
the airport and populated areas would mean a demand for expanded roads.
More lodging and resort facilities would
be needed to handle more tourists.
Pressure would rise to increase allowable
development densities on rural lands to build more homes.
Expanded city and county services (water,
sewage, schools, police and fire, medical, courts, property assessments and
taxation) would be necessary. More vehicles would pump pollution into once-pure
air.
Bank on this, too: Eventually, developers
on the prowl for more land with scenic views would strong arm Washington to give
up public lands to accommodate pricey new homes.
In time, the Wood River Valley would
become just another congested population area with the same aggravating problems
that plague urban areas. Thus, the ambiance and lifestyle that have been
essential to its charm and the allure for those escaping big city tensions will
have vanished.
Does Aspen come to mind?
If this is the vision of a nightmare that
residents up and down the valley want to avoid, then the proverbial line in the
sand must be drawn to preserve the lifestyle of small towns in the mountains.
Otherwise, flinging open the doors to a
suffocating growth pattern can only be stopped when every last acre of land has
been covered with concrete foundations or with asphalt for roads.