Ketchum medical costs soaring, survey 
says
Some city salaries high compared 
to other resorts
"Ketchum currently provides one of the 
most comprehensive medical insurance plans (among Western resort towns) for its 
employees"
— THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE
By GREGORY FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
An analysis of Ketchum city employee 
salaries and benefits has determined that the city pays substantially more for 
medical insurance costs than comparable mountain-resort cities.
Ketchum also pays more for certain city 
staff positions than other similar cities, a report issued this month by The 
Local Government Institute says.
The report, which will be discussed by the 
Ketchum City Council today at 11 a.m., was commissioned by the city to assess 
whether typical city staffers receive salaries and benefits similar to those 
paid by cities such as Aspen, Colo., Vail, Colo., Park City, Utah, Jackson, 
Wyo., and Sun Valley.
Overall, the Washington-based LGI found 
that many of Ketchum’s salaries are appropriate, but some surveyed positions 
need adjustment. "With some exceptions, the city’s current pay plan is generally 
in line with the market at the top step of the city’s current pay plan," the 
report notes.
However, the report recommends that the 
city abolish its somewhat complex salary plan in favor of a new, more uniform 
plan that applies to all city departments and employees.
At the same time, the report recommends 
that the city "form a committee to explore medical coverage options" to reduce 
its medical costs. "Ketchum currently provides one of the most comprehensive 
medical insurance plans for its employees," the report states. In comparing 
Ketchum this year to 21 Western resort cities, LGI found that Ketchum is paying 
nearly twice the average of other mountain resorts for its medical plan. Ketchum 
is paying $598 per month for medical coverage for single employees, while the 
other cities average payments of $311 per month to cover all or part of the 
medical costs for one employee.
The median of the costs incurred by the 21 
other resorts was $300, the report states.
Ketchum pays more than twice as much as 
the 21-city average each month to insure employees with a spouse and two 
children, the report notes.
Ketchum has earmarked approximately $1.1 
million in the draft 2003-2004 city budget to cover healthcare costs.
To bring healthcare costs down, LGI 
recommends that the city seek new bids for coverage, adopt a cafeteria-style 
plan, or "explore plans with high deductibles (and thus lower premiums), with 
the city self-funding a reasonable share of the deductible portion."
As for the city’s salary plan, the report 
studied 10 "key benchmark positions which compose a substantial number of city 
employees."
Of the 10 selected, LGI discovered that 
most salaries paid by Ketchum are in line with the other 21 cities, except for 
the positions of senior planner and fire captain. (The researchers ultimately 
concluded that the data pertaining to the fire captain position was inconclusive 
because most of the 21 comparable cities do not have a similar position.)
Missing from the report, however, is a 
comparison of department head salaries. Ketchum in the last year has 
significantly increased compensation for department heads, in some cases by more 
than 20 percent.
During budget discussions this summer, 
City Administrator Ron LeBlanc said the city needed to increase some department 
head salaries to set them at levels higher than those of some longtime staffers 
at the top of the pay scale.
After reviewing the city’s pay-scale plan, 
LGI recommended that the city simplify the system, in part by lowering the 
number of step increases an employee can graduate through. The city currently 
has four separate pay plans that include 16 to 18 steps, the report notes.
LGI is recommending that the city adopt a 
uniform nine-step plan for all departments.