While Ketchum’s Council fiddles ...
The city of Ketchum is quickly running out 
of capricious ideas and ways to sabotage Brian Barsotti’s proposed new hotel on 
Main Street. 
What else but sabotage could be behind 
changing demands and the foot-dragging on an important new addition to the 
community’s lifeblood, resort lodging?
First it was a matter of structure height, 
which Barsotti lowered. Now it’s seven feet over the height limit, a waiver 
allowed hotels under the city’s ordinance.
Then it was a question, brought up late in 
the game, of Barsotti providing affordable housing units as part of the plan. 
Housing isn’t required of commercial development, nor had the city asked for it.
Then Councilman Randy Hall, who’s become 
the principal obstructionist, insisted on mitigation of traffic impacts even 
though no significant impact would be created, two studies have assured the 
city.
Still, Barsotti is being held hostage to 
the new City Hall gambit--requiring him to play to rules changed in the middle 
of the game.
Had Barsotti invested his money in a 
building of retail shops and offices, or sought to build a fractional-ownership 
residential community on his Main Street property, those options really would 
have created traffic problems, engineers say.
As Councilman Hall has played out his 
delaying tactics in meeting after meeting, the awful truth is that Ketchum is 
losing ground as part of a premiere resort area.
The Sun Valley-Ketchum area has lost 313 
hotel rooms in the past three years--25 percent of its capacity. 
Make no mistake: Without lodging, a major 
source of Ketchum’s city budget, local option taxes on resort activities vanish, 
and city services are hobbled.
Would Councilman Hall like to shift those 
tax losses to Ketchum residents?
Barsotti has been diligent in submitting 
his planned hotel over and over to the city, and time and again he’s made 
changes or conformed to whims that weren’t part of requirements set out in city 
ordinances.
Now comes a crucial Sept. 2 council 
meeting. The council must approve the hotel project.
If it doesn’t, obstructionists on the 
council will be obliged to explain to the community why they reject a finely 
designed hotel that blends architecturally into the city’s downtown, that’s 
owned by a resident investor bending over backward to be a good citizen, and 
that can be a vital step toward restoring the city’s weakened accommodations 
inventory.