What are economic values of wilderness?
Report says protected lands
can boost business
By GREGORY FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
With Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, preparing
to propose designation of the Boulder-White Cloud Mountains as a protected
wilderness area, many residents of central Idaho are considering how such
legislation might affect their local economy.
Some who work in the West’s longtime
staple industries of ranching, mining and agriculture have questioned whether
additional restrictions on land uses in the approximately 800-square-mile area
would stifle key sources of income.
Meanwhile, others have asserted that
wilderness areas give back to rural populations less than they take, creating
only a limited demand for basic services at the expense of traditional
enterprises, cultures, and recreational activities.
However, an in-depth report issued last
month by the Arizona-based Sonoran Institute—a nonprofit environmental
organization with satellite offices in Montana and Canada—suggests that
protected wild landscapes are a key component in strengthening and reviving
depressed rural economies.
The report, called "Working Around the
White Clouds," states that a healthy environment has been one critical element
in the success of Blaine County’s economy, and could be integrated as a catalyst
to boost the economies of neighboring Custer and Butte counties.
Ben Alexander, associate director of the
Sonoran Institute’s SocioEconomics Program and co-author of the report, last
month presented the findings of the report to members of the Boise-based Idaho
Conservation League.
Alexander said the rural West has changed
dramatically, primarily in a fashion that favors service-related jobs over those
that are tied to consumptive uses of public and private lands. "Jobs in rural
Idaho are growing mainly in the service sector," he said, noting that many rural
Idaho residents acquire a significant amount of their income through the
"mailbox"—from outside retirement programs or investments.
Wilderness areas, he said, are not merely
playgrounds for rich residents of established resort communities, but with
specific types of development can serve as economic stimuli.
Communities that offer pristine public
lands along with strong educational institutions, travel infrastructure such as
airports, and a willingness to move away from resource-dependent industries can
attract new residents that include creative entrepreneurs and retirees, the
report notes.
"Studies have shown a strong relationship
between economic growth and the amount of land in protected status," the report
states. "It is clear, however, that protection of environmental amenities and
recreational opportunities is a necessary but not sufficient condition for
economic growth … At the very least, local citizens need to realize that
competing as a low-cost producer of food, fiber, and minerals is no longer a
comparative advantage."
The report specifically studied the
economies of Blaine, Butte and Custer counties, the three counties that surround
the Boulder-White Cloud Mountains.
All of the three counties face economic
challenges that are related directly and indirectly to local uses of public
lands, it says.
Blaine County has developed a healthy
tourism-based economy that attracted substantial numbers of visitors, many of
whom later settled in the area because of its environmental amenities and
regional airplane service. The economy subsequently developed other higher-waged
"knowledge-based" industries, but because of its high real-estate prices cannot
supply a sector of low-wage service workers with local housing, the report
states.
Butte County boasts high incomes—primarily
from jobs supplied by the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental
Laboratory—but has not been successful in getting those high-wage employees to
reside in the county.
In addition, Butte County has failed to
diversify its job base and economy, Alexander noted. "They have not positioned
themselves as a gateway to the mountains," he said.
Custer County has evolved under a
historical dependence on mining and agriculture, and now is suffering from a
decline in the mining industry and flat revenues from agriculture, the report
states.
Thirty-eight percent of Custer residents’
income comes through the mailbox, from various sources including retirement
checks and federal subsidies, he noted. "If anyone tells you it’s a mining-based
economy, a ranching-based economy, a timber-based economy, they’re lying," he
said.
Alexander concluded that communities near
designated protected land areas are more likely to succeed, "in part because you
are on a map."
Studies done outside of the Sonoran
Institute’s report do support its findings that Idaho communities can succeed as
recreational hubs.
A study released last month by the Outdoor
Industry Foundation’s Business for Wilderness program found that Idaho ranked
first nationwide in resident participation in numerous outdoor activities,
including backpacking, climbing, fly fishing and hiking. The study found that
86.8 percent of Idaho residents participated in such activities, part of a
nationwide trend that led to the human-powered recreation industry generating
approximately $18 billion in 2000.
The study also notes that counties that
contain the country’s largest national parks experienced job growth in the last
30 years that was three times faster than the national average. Income growth
occurred at a rate that was twice as fast, it says.
A 2001 study by Oregon-based economic
consultants Dean Runyon Associates—composed for the Sun Valley-Ketchum Chamber
and Visitors Bureau—states that the impacts of tourist spending in 2000 in
Blaine County created 5,980 jobs and $120 million in income.
Simpson last month said his central Idaho
wilderness proposal will almost certainly include incentives to bolster the
economies of communities in Butte and Custer counties.