Give the past a chance
The third try wasn’t a charm.
In its third bid for a home, the
120-year-old church that formerly housed a restaurant was left an orphan by the
Ketchum City Council.
The council, facing a room full of parents
and kids, rejected a proposal to re-locate and expand the city skate park to
make room for the historical structure.
The old church struck out again.
The building has been looking for a home
since its private owners gave it away in 1999. Its former site is now a parking
lot.
It’s getting harder and harder to believe
city leaders have any interest at all in the building—except as kindling.
Yet, Mayor Ed Simon said Ketchum is
"committed" to finding a place for the structure.
The old clapboard church ain’t what it
used to be. Today, the paint is peeling and it’s missing its steeple. Yet, it
was a landmark structure when it was built in this frontier mining town.
When it housed Louie’s Restaurant for
nearly 30 years, it was one of the most visited places in town.
Despite its sagging visage, it has
inspired donations of cash and pledges of time and materials valued in excess of
$100,000. Not bad, but not enough to inspire the city fathers and mother to give
it a new home.
Monday’s proposal looked inspired—until
the city’s own parks department launched a full-scale attack.
The skate park on Saddle Road would have
been relocated and expanded on property earmarked for a YMCA. This would have
been a big score for the park and recreation in general.
The old church would have moved onto the
old skateboard site—directly across the street from a city park. The old
building would have brought charm to an area that is shaping up as a recreation
zone. Once renovated, it could have been used for small meetings and events.
No dice.
The city council, with one absent, voted
3-0 to reject the idea. The council previously had rejected placing the building
in Forest Service Park. The Sun Valley City Council also had refused to put it
on city property.
Clearly, time is running out for the
building.
To know that Ketchum could do worse than
to give the building a home requires only a glance at the parking lot that
occupies the space where this quaint building once stood.
As a city whose economy is highly
dependent on tourism, Ketchum leaders should concern themselves with making the
place attractive to visitors.
Examples abound.
Park City, Utah, decided long ago that the
historic buildings lining the Main Street of the old mining town should be
preserved. It even went so far as to require new buildings in the area to
reflect the style of the old buildings.
Breckenridge, Colo., another ski town that
attracts millions of visitors each year, also elected to preserve its Main
Street collection of Victorian buildings. The city is charming and much loved by
visitors.
The good news and bad news is that Ketchum
has far fewer buildings to protect than other mining towns that turned into
tourist towns. It has fewer than a dozen 19th century buildings.
In the past, Ketchum did well to preserve
the wagons of the Ketchum Fast Freight Line, build the Ore Wagon Museum, and
preserve the David Ketchum House behind it. Residents also enthusiastically
approved the bond issue that protected Forest Service Park, which enabled the
opening of the Ketchum Sun Valley Ski Heritage Museum. All have become
well-visited sites.
The present City Council, on the other
hand, is taking a passive approach to protecting history as evidenced by its
lack of action on the old church. Council members seem to be hoping against hope
it will simply disappear some night.
It hasn’t, and its continuing existence
puts some important issues on the line.
Will the city lose its craggy character as
it loses the last of its old buildings?
Can new buildings ever offer the appeal of
the old?
Is investing in preservation a wise
investment in an enduring and healthy tourist economy?
The City Council should not sit by and
leave these questions unanswered. They should debate and answer them—in public.
This simple white building, a remnant of
an Idaho long gone, could be a white elephant. Or, it could be a little jewel
within the tatters, something new generations will love and support.
The building’s fate should not be decided
by default. City leaders should actively work to find the building a home before
this piece of Ketchum’s past disappears forever.