How should your vote be counted?
Sun Valley City Council
debates election processes
By GREGORY FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
Sun Valley City Council members last week
agreed to investigate whether the city should change how members of the
four-person council are elected by the public.
Responding to a proposal by Sun Valley
resident Milt Adam, council members on Thursday, May 15, debated whether City
Council members should be elected to fill designated seats or as at-large
candidates that earn the most votes.
"I think the city is better served by
having open elections rather than designated-seat elections," Adam told the
council.
At issue is how the city conducts its
bi-annual elections for City Council seats.
Under a system approved in 1995, the city
currently asks the electorate to vote every other year for two separate
candidates seeking to fill specific numbered seats on the council. Terms on the
council last for four years, with two members of the panel being re-elected or
replaced every two years.
Candidates are required in the process to
designate which of the two seats up for election they intend to fill.
Adam last week argued that designated-seat
elections clearly favor incumbents and are generally inappropriate for small
cities.
He said that designated-seat elections are
problematic chiefly because they do not require incumbents to campaign against
each other. In addition, he noted that the two candidates who gain the most
votes are not elected to the council if they happen to be running for the same
council seat.
"I don’t see how that benefits democracy,
as such," he said.
Adam noted that in the 1999 Sun Valley
City Council election—for designated Seats 1 and 2 on the panel—three candidates
ran for Seat 1 and the candidate for Seat 2, Lud Renick, ran unopposed.
Ultimately, Renick and Council President Latham Williams won the two seats.
(Adams was one of two candidates who
challenged Williams for his seat. The two seats will be up for re-election next
November.)
Seats 3 and 4—currently occupied by
Councilman Kevin Laird and Councilwoman Ann Agnew, respectively—were last up for
election in November 2001.
Adam noted that the city of Ketchum—after
a long public debate on the matter—in February returned to an open-seat election
process after spending approximately two years under the designated-seat
election process.
He also noted that only eight of Idaho’s
114 cities hold designated-seat elections for city councils, most of them larger
cities.
Councilman Laird said the 1995 decision by
the city of Sun Valley to engage in designated-seat elections was done primarily
to prompt more political debate among candidates. The process was meant to
encourage challengers to run against a specific incumbent while focusing on
specific issues, he said.
Councilman Renick said he does not believe
incumbents are always granted an advantage. "Look at the local history," he
said. "The incumbents do not have an edge in the last three elections in Sun
Valley."
Ketchum resident Mickey Garcia said that
both systems have drawbacks, with open-seat elections promoting so-called
"bullet voting," the so-called practice of voters selecting only one candidate
for two or more open seats.
Wilson said having designated seats keeps
elections from becoming "a popularity vote."
However, city resident Jon Thorson said
designated-seat elections typically do not foster debate. He added that he
believes bullet voting "is a person’s right."
Thorson and Adam asked council members to
conduct an advisory vote on the issue.
Council members directed city staff to
research the results of city elections since 1980, prior to an ensuing
discussion on the matter next month.