Is Sen. Craig
out of touch?
Conservationists who spend their waking
hours fighting to preserve Idaho’s world-class reputation for rigorous
environmental policing have ample grounds to oppose the backdoor amendment to
federal energy legislation introduced by Idaho’s senior senator, Larry Craig.
Reasons?
First, Sen. Craig’s cavalier explanation
that his amendment merely would streamline the complex relicensing process for
hydroelectric dams is disingenuous and ignores the most odorous feature. It
would water down powers of federal agencies to impose strict environmental
conditions on hydroelectric operators, weaken the role of responsible
conservation groups and give electricity producers, like Idaho Power, authority
to appeal to a Cabinet secretary outside the hearing process.
Second, the amendment panders to the
anti-environment cravings of the current administration in Washington, which
wants to turn back the clock on sensible environmental safeguards that range
from attempts to curb global warming, curtail snowmobiling in Yellowstone, and
enforce air and water quality rules, to name a few.
Sen. Craig’s invitation to hydroelectric
operators to take their bite out of the environment via industry-friendly
political appointees is just another insult against responsible use of our
natural resources.
But, even though the hydro-dams process
has become overly tedious, it remains the last best chance for environmentalists
to obtain wildlife mitigation for past mistakes produced by the dams.
Relicensing applicants need to address these issues in good faith, and there
should be no tampering with the integrity of federal safeguards now in place to
review license renewal applications.
Although maintaining a profitable
electricity generating industry is indispensable to any area’s economy,
hydroelectric dams that rely on powerful river currents must be subservient to
the fish and wildlife of the river corridors, as well as the scenic and
recreational values of rivers. All are irreplaceable and indispensable bounties
of nature that make Idaho and other Western states such phenomenal natural
wonderlands.
It may be that Sen. Craig, as a
beneficiary of generous election support from the hydroelectric industry, is out
of touch with public attitudes.
Public hostility continues to grow over
the destructive effects of dams on salmon and steelhead. And, only last week, a
federal judge ruled that Columbia River Basin programs intended to protect
salmon are insufficient, promptly giving heart and hope to those who believe the
four dams on the lower Snake River should be breached to prevent the ultimate
extinction of wild Snake River salmon stocks.
Sen. Craig's amendment catering to the
hydroelectric industry is not only patently political, but surely badly timed
and contrary to a nasty public mood about certain ill-conceived dams that in
time could boomerang on Sen. Craig's benefactors in the industry.