Will Cheney reclusiveness end?
Commentary by PAT MURPHY
Dick Cheney is a man suited for the 
superlatives he’s compiled over time.
Among all U.S. vice presidents, Cheney is 
the most widely experienced (serving formerly as a congressman, White House 
aide, Defense Secretary, vice president, corporate CEO), the wealthiest (he 
received a $30 million stock payoff when he resigned from Halliburton in 2000), 
and the unhealthiest (he has had several heart attacks and relies on a heart 
Pacemaker), although several presidents were sicker.
He’s also by far the most reclusive in a 
job requiring occupants to be constantly seen if not always heard.
Other vice presidents in my 
lifetime—Garner, Wallace, Truman, Barkley, Nixon, Johnson, Humphrey, Agnew, 
Ford, Rockefeller, Mondale, Bush, Quayle, Gore—were highly visible and 
accessible. 
So, with al-Qaeda broken (as President 
Bush says), with Iraq conquered, and with stringent domestic security measures 
in place, will Vice President Cheney end his secretive lifestyle and return to 
the public stage for a Bush-Cheney campaign?
Cheney has been retreating to an 
"undisclosed" hiding place during the terrorism scare most of his term. The 
official explanation is baffling, however.
Is Dick Cheney less expendable and more 
vulnerable than the President of the United States, who’s out and about making 
speeches and glad-handing, and even landing in a jet on an aircraft carrier?
(An aside: Democratic demands for an 
investigation into the politics of "Top Gun" Bush’s carrier landing is as 
pathetic as the infantile Republican demand for investigating whether President 
Clinton held up Air Force One on a Los Angeles International Airport taxiway in 
1993 while a celebrity hair stylist gave him a $200 trim.) 
Uncharitable partisans would nod yes—that 
Cheney is indispensable because he does most White House thinking, composes key 
legislation, and pushes major personnel appointments, and without him, Bush 
would be lost. 
Cheney usually emerges to appear only in 
friendly venues, then hurries off. What few questions he answers of Washington 
media is not in press conferences, to which even the reluctant President Bush 
submits, but on one-on-one television Sunday talk shows not as aggressive as 
White House press free-for-alls. Even on rare occasions when he appears to break 
tie votes in the Senate, he takes a quick powder after the tally.
In Washington circles, cynics say the 
explanation is that Cheney is dodging questions about Halliburton, the 
corporation he captained.
Halliburton is under fire for questionable 
accounting procedures, for multi-million dollar no-bid contracts in Iraq even 
before the shooting is over, and for a $2.4 million bribe Halliburton paid in 
Nigeria for favorable tax treatment (the bribe reportedly was paid after Cheney 
left Halliburton).
Most Americans probably care less about 
questions involving Halliburton than why Cheney is so furtive and shadowy as 
vice president.
Washington reporters, who seem cowered by 
Bush & Co., have avoided asking. Maybe the Democratic 2004 vice presidential 
candidate will muster courage to ask Cheney why he’s more inaccessible than even 
the president.
That is, assuming Cheney emerges from 
reclusiveness to take part in political debates in the 2004 campaign.