Heidelberg Inn proposal gets mixed 
review
Some P&Z members, 
public say it’s too dense
By GREGORY FOLEY
Express Staff Writer
A proposal by a California-based 
development group to raze the Heidelberg Inn and redevelop the site with 33 
townhouse units received a lukewarm reception before the Ketchum Planning and 
Zoning Commission Monday, May 12.
In a pre-application review of the 
proposal, commissioners issued a mix of reactions, with comments focused 
primarily on the proposed density of the project.
"To me this thing falls way short of 
anything, in clear conscience, that I could approve," said Commissioner Rod 
Sievers. "It’s way too dense."
However, P&Z Chairman Peter Ripsom said he 
believes densely developed projects are not inherently good or bad for the 
community, but believes their value is largely dependent on the design and 
layout of the buildings included.
At issue is a proposal by Wareham 
Development, the developer of the Thunder Spring complex on Saddle Road, to 
build eight separate residential buildings on the Heidelberg Inn site. The 
approximately 1.9-acre parcel is located at 1908 Warm Springs Road.
The company and its architect, Calthorpe 
Associates, in April filed a design-review preapplication asking the city to 
review and give feedback on a set of preliminary plans for the project.
The preliminary proposal calls for 33, 
two- and three-bedroom townhouses ranging from approximately 1,350 square feet 
to 1,650 square feet. The new development would comprise approximately 50,000 
square feet of new buildings on the site.
The application, if forwarded as proposed, 
would require approval as a planned-unit development, city planners have noted. 
A planned-unit development typically offers developers a special allowance—such 
as increased density—in exchange for a public benefit, such as open space or 
community housing.
Joey Scanga, representative for Calthorpe, 
told commissioners and an audience of 35 area residents that the density of the 
proposed development would be just under 17 units per acre. He said the 
developers believe the project would have less impact on the surrounding 
environment than the site’s existing 50 hotel rooms--which have been used over 
the last two years to house workers building the Thunder Spring project.
"The idea was not to fit the most units, 
but a comfortable number of units on this site," he said.
The parcel’s Limited Residential zoning 
allows approximately five units to be developed on each acre of land.
Scanga said the proposed project would be 
built at a density that is similar to the Four Seasons and The Fields 
developments on neighboring properties.
A PUD for the site would ultimately need 
the approval of the Ketchum City Council and would mandate that a specific 
percentage of the development be allocated for affordable housing.
Scanga said an affordable housing 
component would be included in plans for the site but had not yet been 
designated for specific units.
Sievers was the first to comment on the 
proposal, noting that he believes any project that "approaches the density of 
The Fields and the Four Seasons" would be too dense for the site.
Commissioner Harold Johnson noted that the 
snow storage included in the plans appeared inadequate.
Several members of the public voiced 
concerns about the plan.
Ketchum resident Mickey Garcia said the 
project would be beneficial because it offered affordable housing. "The cities 
are where the densities are supposed to go," he said.
Four Seasons resident Tina Fabiano said 
she thinks the developers could devise a better plan that would have less impact 
on neighboring properties. "I feel like what you’re doing is the worst-case 
scenario," she said.