book review:
Gawande
reveals
the perplexing
world of medicine
By ADAM
TANOUS
Express Arts Editor
It is not
a particularly profound revelation to note that our relationship with
the world of medicine is a troubled one.
Complications:
A Surgeon’s Notes on an Imperfect Science By
Atul Gawande. 269
pp. Henry Holt and Co. $24.
Despite
the nearly exponential growth in medical knowledge and care—in fields
of genetics, molecular biology and a whole host of other technical
advances—there seems to be a considerable amount of discontent among
patients.
Then
along comes a surgical resident named Atul Gawande with his book
"Complications: A Surgeon’s Notes on an Imperfect Science."
And what Gawande leaves us with is the lasting and important thought
that medicine is very much a human endeavor—a fact that is responsible
for both its triumphs and failures.
In his
introduction, Gawande writes: "Medicine is, I have found, a strange
and in many ways disturbing business. The stakes are high, the liberties
taken tremendous. We drug people, put needles and tubes into them,
manipulate their chemistry, biology, and physics, lay them unconscious
and open their bodies up to the world. We do so out of an abiding
confidence in our know-how as a profession. What you find when you get
in close, however—close enough to see the furrowed brows, the doubts
and missteps, the failures as well as the successes—is how messy,
uncertain, and also surprising medicine turns out to be."
Atul
Gawande. Photo by Graham Gordon Ramsay
Such an
admission from a Harvard-trained doctor, ostensibly one of the best,
might be at first blush unsettling to readers and patients. Yet, it is
Gawande’s honesty in discussing cases, his and colleagues’, that is
ultimately reassuring. What resonates at the core of the book, and at
the core of medicine in general, is a basic humility. It is a humility
that allows a doctor to move past the shortcomings of the profession, to
remain inquisitive, to question each move—always with the patient’s
interests foremost in mind.
Gawande
divides his book into three sections: the fallibility of doctors, the
mysteries of medicine, and the uncertainty that is and likely will
remain at the center of the field.
The first
goes into great detail as to how mistakes in medicine are made. These
are systematic errors and individual ones. The former are often
identifiable and fixable; the latter are distressing but inevitable.
"You have a cough that won’t go away—and then? It’s not
science you call upon but a doctor. A doctor with good days and bad
days. A doctor with a weird laugh and a bad haircut. A doctor with three
other patients to see and, inevitably, gaps in what he knows and skills
he’s still trying to learn," Gawande writes.
He goes
on to point out, "If error were due to a subset of dangerous
doctors, you might expect malpractice cases to be concentrated among a
small group, but in fact they follow a uniform, bell-shaped
distribution. Most surgeons are sued at least once in the course of
their careers. Studies of specific types of error, too, have found that
repeat offenders are not the problem." These are sobering facts,
but critical ones because they dispel our misconceptions about medicine
and its practitioners.
Gawande
also discusses the inherent conflict in medicine: that of the desire to
give patients the best possible care while at the same time allowing
young doctors to gain experience. Without the latter, of course, the
profession would come to a grinding halt. As he points out, surgeons
"believe in practice, not talent …what’s most important to them
is finding people who are conscientious, industrious, and boneheaded
enough to stick at practicing this one difficult thing day and night for
years on end."
Perhaps
the most intriguing section of the book has to do with decision-making
in medicine. A decade ago, patients simply did what doctors told them
was the best course. Now patients are much more actively involved in
decision making. It is a problematic development: "People are
rightly suspicious of those claiming to know better than they do what’s
best for them. But a good physician cannot simply stand aside when
patients make bad or self-defeating decisions—decisions that go
against their deepest goals," Gawande writes. To what extent can or
should a doctor venture from the technical into the personal aspects of
a given medical decision? It is a question doctors wrestle with case by
case.
"Complications"
is an engaging, well-written book. To read it is to meet the people a
surgical resident meets, to understand the decisions they and their
patients face and the difficulty in getting the right outcome.