Craig comes out
against recreation fee
program
By ASSOCIATED
PRESS
Sen.
Larry Craig, R-Idaho, has reversed his stand and joined fellow GOP Sen.
Mike Crapo in opposing continuation of the recreation fee program in the
nation's national forests.
"The
grades are in, and the recreation fee demonstration project has flunked
in Idaho," Craig wrote in an op-ed piece issued last week, and
appears in this issue of the Mountain Express. "We have seen the
Forest Service aggressively grow the user fees beyond the original
intent of the program."
But Craig
conceded that if the fee program that has generated more than $750
million nationwide is not extended, Congress must find a way to deal
with the increasing use of the nation's forests and rivers and the
impact that has on the resource.
"First
we need to properly fund recreation activities on public lands,"
the state’s senior senator said. He also called for end of litigation
over land management decisions and programs to control overuse of
popular recreation sites.
Craig had
recently voiced support for the fee program that was implemented on a
trial basis in 1997. The Sawtooth National Recreation Area was among the
first places affected. A general access fee was quickly replaced by a $5
per day or $15 annual parking fee.
Scott
Phillips of Hailey, a retired U.S. Forest Service recreation specialist
who has actively opposed the fees, said Craig "should have gotten
it right two years ago, but he should still be commended."
Critics
claim the fees are essentially a second tax on resource users who have
already paid taxes to support public land management.
Craig
said that his decision to oppose extension because fee revenue has
provided the Forest Service the cash flow needed to finance fire
suppression rather than recreational facility improvements. He also
complained about some forests imposing separate fees at individual
recreational sites instead of one fee to take advantage of a general
area.
"Administrative
expansions like this have only undermined the public's trust in this
program and provided reason for change,'' Craig said.
In an
informal survey this month, trail users were almost evenly split on the
user fees.
"I
think it’s becoming necessary, because there are so many people coming
up here now," said Brent Haleen of Ketchum.
Ketchum
artist Will Caldwell, a vocal fee opponent, expressed fear that the
program is the first step toward privatizing and commercializing forest
lands.
Dianne
Johns of Hailey said the program does not appear to be managed well.
"I
feel like the money spent on implementing it is money wasted," she
said. "I feel like already pay for it with my taxes."