Idaho’s fixable
scandal
The
insulting campaign of Starr Kelso for a seat on the Idaho Supreme Court
had unintended consequences: He demonstrated the risk of gadflies being
elected to manage Idaho’s deadly serious business of the courts.
Even
legislators slow to reform should now consider a better system that takes
courts out of politics and protects them from candidates with scant little
to recommend them.
Happily,
Chief Justice Linda Copple Trout was re-elected by a substantial 62
percent after an 11th hour television response to brand Kelso’s
campaign for what it was—a smear and a mockery.
The
candidacy of Kelso, a Coeur d’Alene attorney, and the mysterious support
of the so-called Idahoans for Tax Reform is under investigation.
Presumably the state attorney general has the stamina to impose penalties
if required.
The
so-called tax reform group and its swashbuckling leader, Laird Maxwell,
spent handsomely on TV ads that offered rightwing gibberish in Kelso’s
behalf—Trout is "liberal," Kelso is a man of
"values."
Kelso,
meanwhile, played ignoramus. He knew nothing of the campaign, couldn’t
explain how family photos fell into the hands of the campaign, and hadn’t
even seen the commercials. He told one Boise TV station his dog chewed
through the TV cable. So much for Kelso’s believability.
As for
Kelso’s qualifications, he boasts a populist resume—he provided
basketball nets for a school, raised money for a playground, worked as a
roofer, miner and deputy sheriff, among other things.
But not
much about lawyer skills.
Justice
Trout’s career, however, is festooned with various judicial assignments
that testify to her credentials.
Yet, the
frightful reality is that the likes of a Starr Kelso could sit on the
Idaho Supreme Court because of a system that trifles with the public’s
right to quality in the courts.