Why public trust is
vanishing
Commentary
by PAT MURPHY
Incensed
that anyone would dare ask what President Bush might have known before
Sept. 11, Vice President Cheney insinuates that only the unpatriotic would
raise such an issue.
Cheney
prefers the nation taking his word that nothing will be gained from an
inquiry. It would only comfort terrorists.
Some gall.
Cheney,
whose imperious and patronizing air is reminiscent of courtiers to King
George, forgets that the United States is not an oligarchy in which
subjects fawn and blindly accept patronizing assurances of an elite.
The vice
president and his protégé, President Bush, can blame only themselves for
lost public trust.
It was
Cheney and Bush and their counselors who vowed that only limited contacts
were made between the White House and Enron’s sleazy executives. Now,
after threats from Congress, the White House reluctantly released data —
with more to come — showing three times as many contacts. Enron CEO
Kenneth Lay was rarely out of sight around the White House.
Cheney also
has been hauled into court for refusing to disclose names of executives
who forged the Bush administration’s energy policies. His defense?
Secrecy is required to govern.
It was the
Bush-Cheney pick for attorney general, John Ashcroft, who likewise
informed federal agencies that he can be counted on to help them resist
demands under the Freedom of Information Act for material to which the
public is entitled. Should the public be faulted for assuming the Bush
administration has something to hide?
Then,
reinforcing public distrust, President Bush deceitfully ascribed
California’s summer power blackouts to scarce petroleum supplies, thus
justification to drill for more Alaskan oil. Now the truth is out — that
energy firms such as Enron, operated by Bush’s closest political
supporters, created artificial power shortages for higher profits.
President
Bush added to public cynicism with his executive order sealing papers of
living presidents, a transparent effort to protect secrets in his father’s
presidency.
The Bush
administration, however, is not alone in betraying the public. Lies,
deceit and corrupt conduct have shredded believability of institutions
everywhere: CEOs jumping ship with multi-million dollar profits as their
companies sink into bankruptcy; Wall Street firms found to have promoted
stocks that inside analysts privately considered junk; the Catholic church’s
princes engaged in cover-up of widespread criminal sexual conduct by
hundreds of priests; the FBI’s competence in question not only about
Sept. 11 information but a spy undetected in its midst for years; the
Defense Department confirming it doused unsuspecting GIs with nerve gas in
the 1960s without their permission; the Washington area’s huge charity,
United Way, accused by some of its own directors in the newest major
charity controversy of misuse of funds.
And on goes
egregious behavior throughout American life, fueled by the basic America
goodness of trusting.
It’s
refreshing that some in Congress refuse to be bullied by the vice
president and President Bush and their insinuations that questioning them
erodes the air of patriotism that they’ve so cynically cultivated for
political advantage.
The sooner
questions begin, the sooner accountability will be restored to a White
House whose principal occupant says "my government" in speeches
rather than "our government."
That should
be a Freudian tip-off to how this president regards the rest of us.