Quick chemical fix
always has a hidden cost
By DICK
DORWORTH
My youngest
son Jason is a fine, responsible, active man of 31 and a joy in my
life. He is a college graduate who makes his living as a
paramedic/fireman.
As a
professional, he knows a great deal about the science and effects of many
drugs on the human system. When he was in the first grade, he was termed
"hyperactive," what came to be known in the pop psychology of
pharmacology as ADD, or Attention Deficit Disorder and, later, ADHD, or
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. That is, Jason was a natural boy
of 6 with an abundance of energy and intelligence who was bored out of his
gourd, bored to tears, bored to action and movement by sitting at a desk
in a row while a teacher tried to keep order in her classroom through
conformity and rote memorization.
There were
aspects of his life at home that were disturbing and unacceptable to him,
and school was one place to vent those aggravations in his life. He did
not sit still nor remain quiet for the standardization that is a public
school first grade classroom. He disrupted his class. He was not a good
soldier nor a candidate for the future organization men of America. I was
neither surprised nor as disturbed as I should have been by his social
recalcitrance, and, as a consequence, I was not nearly attentive enough to
it.
Jason’s
energy and intelligence were a gift to him, a joy and a pleasure (and, on
occasion, an amazing frustration) to me. It is not hard to understand that
his school teacher and administrators took a different view. And they had
the perfect solution to what they saw as Jason’s problem and that I
viewed (and view) as their problem—-daily doses of Ritalin.
Ritalin is
the brand name for methylphenidate, a "mild" stimulant of the
central nervous system, whose exact mode of action on that system is not
completely understood. Though I did not know it at the time, Ritalin
produces hallucinations and paranoia in a significant number (about 9
percent) of those who take it. In the pharmacological/psychiatric trade,
it is credited with "unmasking" latent clinical depression,
schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in its users, conditions which that
métier addresses with regular doses of other drugs whose exact mode of
action on the central nervous system are also incompletely understood.
It is my
opinion that the word "unmasking" is erroneous;
"causing" is the more accurate word. Alcohol, too, is known to
"unmask" those same conditions as well as a variety of other
social disorders, including hostility, violence, idiocy, lethal driving,
boorish behavior, really boorish conversation and even more boorish
breath, but to my knowledge no moderately dependable person prescribes
more or other drugs as a cure. Common sense and objective observation
dictates that the cure to such "unmasking" is to cease ingesting
the original drug.
While my
knowledge of Ritalin was scant, my instincts were excellent and my
personal, experiential knowledge of many other drugs was significant. And
no one was going to secure my permission to chemically mutilate my son’s
behavior or mood so that he could more easily blend in with the school
furniture.
If only
instinctively, I knew what Dr. Peter Breggin wrote many years later in the
New York Times: "Attention deficit disorder does not reflect children’s
attention deficits but our lack of attention to their needs." That
lack in myself at the time it was needed is something I deeply regret.
I was
called to a meeting with Jason’s teacher, the principal and the school
nurse. I knew that Jason’s problems in school were a direct result of
his life at home (i.e. my own problems and failings, stresses and
disorders), as well as the school’s inability to deal with each child’s
individual needs. Being all too familiar with hallucinations and paranoia,
I assumed they believed all of Jason’s unwillingness to fit into the
school curriculum was my fault.
Nevertheless,
with some if not full awareness of my own failures, contradictions and
hypocrisies in the matter, I told them I thought they were crazy to be
drugging children in order to get them through a day of school. Even then,
sitting in a room with three proper and competent educators, including
Jason’s teacher, a beautiful single woman, who I sometimes saw drinking
and dancing in the local bars, I was acutely aware of the incongruity of
the scene: three proper, conservatively dressed American public school
educators of the 1970s and me—dressed in faded denim pants held up with
a colorful hand-dyed tied woolen belt from Argentina, huaraches, a
turtle-neck shirt and a sheep skin vest, a head of black hair falling to
below my shoulder blades and a full beard to the middle of my chest—discussing
the advantages and disadvantages of schools legally drugging six year olds
with the consent of their parents. I assume they were aware of the
situation’s ironies, and I hope it gave them a smile and some insight
into our culture’s contradictions. It certainly did me.
I refused
the consent and Jason never became a Ritalin junkie. He is now a fine and
responsible and active man, and still a joy in my life. He is thankful
that I did not allow the entrenched school system to flood his developing
system with mild stimulants. He has told me so many times.
That, of
course, was in the early days of systemically altering human behavior with
chemicals. It is now an enormous business having a profound effect on our
culture, the practice of medicine and the living experience of millions of
people.
They are
not health food, but anti-depressants are a staple of the diet of the
wealthiest nation in the history of mankind. I, for one, agree with Dr.
Breggin about ADD, and his point applies to several other maladies of our
time. Their solutions lie in attention to and confrontation with their
roots, not in masking their manifestations with chemicals.
The quick
chemical fix, whether it be insecticide, pesticide, mild stimulant of the
human central nervous system, anti-depressant or defoliant, has always has
a hidden cost. They may make life easier in the short run, and it is
surely good business for the pharmacology and petrochemical industries,
but there is always runoff, and there is always an unexpected consequence
somewhere downstream, and it is cumulative.