Today’s Time is
not our grandfathers’ magazine
Commentary
by PAT MURPHY
If you buy
the proclamation in People magazine (an AOL Time Warner company) that
actor Pierce Brosnan is "the sexiest man alive," then you can
accept the proclamation of Time magazine (another AOL Time Warner company)
that New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani is "Person of the Year" who,
according to Time’s selection criterion, "for better or worse, has
most influenced events in the preceding year."
Both
choices are filled with doubts.
Brosnan may
be the "sexiest man alive" to the handful of People editors who
dwell on men in the celebrity circles they cover, but arguably not
"the sexiest man alive" in the whole world.
And
although Mayor Giuliani surely deserves rave reviews and the nation’s
gratitude for guiding New York through the horrific crisis of Sept. 11 and
thereafter, he hardly "has most influenced events in the preceding
year."
Time ducked
the obvious choice—Osama bin Laden—a man whose maniacal obsession with
"infidels" has ignited a worldwide war on terrorism, left a
chilling international fear of new sneak attacks on big cities and forever
ended the easy-going American way of life.
Time
magazine’s probable thinking, notwithstanding its lavish praise of
Giuliani and belittling of bin Laden as little more than a dismissible
pest, was that picking bin Laden would have invited a staggering boycott
of the media giant by advertisers, readers and TV viewers. Remember the
outrage vented on ABC television when comic Bill (Politically Incorrect)
Maher seemed to criticize U.S. military tactics?
Mayor
Giuliani’s feel-good choice was a safe bet at a time when Americans are
celebrating patriotism of their own.
Yet, bin
Laden, not Giuliani, meets the "Person of the Year" (formerly
"Man of the Year") benchmark set 70 years ago by Henry Luce,
Time’s founder, who dreamed up the title to lift sagging December
newsstand sales. He explicitly included villains as candidates.
Bin Laden
has convulsed the world with his firebrand religious zealotry
Cowering in
caves of the destitute backwater nation, Afghanistan, bin Laden engineered
the kamikaze attack on the World Trade Center’s twin towers with a
deadlier loss of life than Pearl Harbor.
As the
world’s most wanted fugitive, he has a $25 million reward on his head—history’s
highest.
He forced
the United States to launch tens of thousands of its best ground, sea and
air warriors and their high tech weapons and intelligence systems into
action at a cost of billions of dollars, along with the contributions of
50 nations in the war coalition.
Bin Laden’s
attack has left the U.S. airline and tourism industries reeling with deep
financial losses, followed by massive layoffs and reduced consumer
spending, and police state measures to detect and prevent further
terrorism.
His name
and his followers dominate world news reports and are the major topic of
obsessive U.S. television cable networks.
Bin Laden’s
infamy has inspired a cultural renaissance in U.S. patriotism and the
flying of Old Glory.
In short,
the reclusive, cave-dwelling bin Laden almost single-handedly has created
upheaval of the world, spread fear and paranoia across the face of the
earth and made terrorism a household dread even in the world’s safest
country.
Time
magazine has every right to believe Giuliani "has most influenced
events in the preceding year" just as its companion magazine, People,
has every right to declare actor Brosnan the "sexiest man
alive."
But editors
at both magazines run the risk of treating readers as gullible nincompoops
by bestowing superlatives that fail reality checks.