County shuns
transit plan
Without funds,
commissioners
won’t commit to projects
By TRAVIS
PURSER
Express Staff Writer
The Blaine
County Commission refuses to endorse a study that describes ways to
improve public transportation in the Wood River Valley over the next 20
years.
Lack of
commissioner support is related not so much to the study’s content as to
a lack of funding for transit projects. Without funds available,
commissioners won’t commit to the projects.
Before
transit advocates turn to the county, the three-member board agrees, they
should look to the Idaho Legislature for help. The commissioners advise
proponents of an all-day, valley-wide bus system, park-and-ride lots and
light rail to draft and promote a legislative bill that would allow county
voters to approve a local tax to pay for those things.
"If
you can’t do that," Commissioner Dennis Wright said during a
hearing that was practically unattended by the public Monday morning,
"it doesn’t matter what you’ve been smoking and coming up with
visionary concepts here."
Wright was
referring to a $80,000 Blaine County Public Transportation Feasibility
Study funded by the Idaho Transportation Board, which oversees state road
planning.
Commissioners
Mary Ann Mix and Sarah Michael and several other local officials chose a
planning firm called Otak, based near Aspen, to draft the document. In its
75 pages, it states county planners must do more than just add lanes to
Highway 75 to solve the county’s growing traffic problems.
Wood River
Rideshare coordinator Beth Callister, an outspoken advocate of public
transit who helped organize public meetings to gather suggestions on the
Otak report when it was being drafted, was not able to attend Monday’s
commission hearing.
"I do
understand that there needs to be funding, but there needs to be some
agreed-upon direction [also]," she said Tuesday. "Otherwise,
what’s the motive to get the [funding]?"
For the
next two years, Otak recommends, the county should work with city
governments to fund programs that raise public awareness of transit
options. The governments should also expand the existing Ketchum-area KART
bus service, expand Rideshare, develop carpool-only lanes on Highway 75
and participate in an Idaho Department of Transportation environmental
study, now underway, of proposed highway expansion projects.
But, Wright
said, "we are basically going right down this path already" even
without the help of the Otak study.
It was the
report’s long-term recommendations that worried the board the most.
Commissioners said they would not saddle the county with a five- to
20-year agenda to create a regional transit authority, build transit
infrastructure and maybe even build a $20 million railway system before a
method of funding those things is available.
A local
option tax, which county voters could approve specifically for transit,
could provide that funding. But Idaho law would have to be changed first.
Similar
legislation that allows Ketchum to collect a special tax to pay for costs
associated with tourism took six years to get through the Legislature, Mix
said. However, she said she believes a law for transit could move faster.
Meanwhile,
Ketchum officials approved a resolution in March to endorse one piece of
the Otak study that suggests the city use paid parking to discourage an
increase in the average number of vehicles entering the city.
North-county
Commissioner Michael denied, however, that commuters are getting the stick
of paid parking without the carrot of alternatives to single-occupancy
vehicles. She said carpool-only lanes would be considered after the
current highway work south of Ketchum is finished in spring 2002.
Ketchum has
not set a date to begin charging for parking.
Michael
also cited the existing Rideshare program as an alternative for commuters.