Upper Big Wood protection quashed
      Legislative committee votes against bill
      
      "I am bewildered by the knee-jerk reaction to
      automatically deny a public hearing on this important matter."
      Sen. Clint Stennett, D-Ketchum
      
      By GREG STAHL
      Express Staff Writer
      
      Blaine County Sen. Clint Stennett’s effort to
      give the upper Big Wood and North Fork of the Big Wood rivers special
      water quality protection was thwarted practically before it began.
      In a Senate Resources and Environment Committee meeting
      last Wednesday, committee members voted 6 to 5 not to allow the Blaine
      County Democrat to print an Outstanding Resource Waters bill for the two
      rivers, which join at Sawtooth National Recreation Area headquarters, just
      north of Ketchum.
      It is traditional courtesy for fellow legislators and
      committee colleagues to allow personal bills to be printed and to decide
      an issue’s merits during a public hearing, Stennett said. Denying
      printing denies the public the opportunity to comment on the proposal.
      "I am bewildered by the knee-jerk reaction to
      automatically deny a public hearing on this important matter,"
      Stennett said. "I had hoped to bring people in from the Wood River
      Valley to testify before the committee. I think our community would
      support it."
      Stennett acknowledged there are no immediate threats to
      water quality in the upper Big Wood River. However, he said, "the Big
      Wood River provides all drinking water to the Wood River Valley as it
      replenishes the aquifer. Keeping this important resource in pristine
      condition is something we all want."
      Outstanding Resource Waters designation is permitted by
      the federal Clean Water Act and provides maximum protection to water
      quality. Designation would reduce activities in a river basin to those
      that would not harm it.
      Activities such as new or expanded mining would most
      likely be prohibited, Stennett said.
      In early January, he said optimistically about his Big
      Wood proposal that "if there’s no local opposition, it’ll
      pass." Non-local, legislative opposition, apparently, is what he didn’t
      count on.
      "I didn’t take it personally, but there’s just an
      absolute opposition to Outstanding Resource Waters designations," he
      said.
      The committee’s vote also surprised the state’s
      leading environmental activist group, the Idaho Conservation League (ICL).
      "We’re fairly astounded that the committee went in
      that direction," said ICL conservation associate Dallas Gudgell, who
      attended the hearing. "It was definitely a bloody nose [for Stennett].
      "It just doesn’t make sense. This is what Idaho
      should want: a state program to monitor state waters and to relieve
      federal pressure" to preserve water quality.
      Gudgell said committee chair Sen. Laird Noh, R-Kimberly,
      argued in favor of printing the bill, but committee members Sen. Stan
      Hawkins, R-Ucon, and freshman Sen. Skip Brandt, R-Stites, successfully
      spearheaded the drive to not allow printing at all.
      Neither Hawkins nor Brandt returned phone calls from the Mountain
      Express.
      Last week was the first time Stennett proposed the
      Outstanding Resource Waters designation for the Big Wood, but he attempted
      three times in prior legislative sessions to pass a bill protecting the
      Middle Fork of the Salmon River under the same designation. It’s become
      something of a crusade for him.
      "Almost every year I’ve been working on the Middle
      Fork proposal," he said.
      Several years ago, the bill for the Middle Fork passed the
      Senate, but died during a committee hearing in the House.
      The Outstanding Resource Waters provision of the Clean
      Water Act has been on the books since 1989, but not one river in Idaho,
      Washington, Oregon or Alaska has been designated with the Outstanding
      Resource Waters label, Gudgell said.
      Idaho has had a state law permitting designation of
      Outstanding Resource Waters since the same year.
      Florida has the highest number of Outstanding Resource
      Waters in the country, and most other states that have used the law are on
      the eastern side of the Mississippi River.
      Despite the committee defeat last week, Stennett said he
      won’t give up.
      "I’m going to keep working the edges here," he
      said. "Let’s get it in place and show that it doesn’t hurt
      anybody. I want an Outstanding Resource Water designated so we can prove
      that it doesn’t have an adverse effect on people."
      In addition to Stennett’s Big Wood proposal, state
      lawmakers will have another opportunity to vote for clean water when the
      Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) presents its request that
      the Selway and Middle Fork of the Salmon rivers be named Outstanding
      Resource Waters later in the legislative session.
      The Middle Fork request is unrelated to Stennett’s prior
      proposals, but he said he supports the DEQ’s effort.
      "When Idaho DEQ asks lawmakers for approval to use an
      11-year-old program to protect Idaho’s best rivers, I hope they do the
      right thing and make at least one vote for clean water," Gudgell
      said.
      Clean water protection for the Selway and Middle Fork has
      the support of the Nez Perce, Bitterroot and Panhandle national forests,
      former Gov. John Evans and the Nez Perce Tribe.
      "There has never been a better time to vote to
      protect part of what makes Idaho, Idaho: clean, clear rivers,"
      Gudgell said.