SNRA reveals proposal to tighten building standards
      
      "We’re trying to bring some common sense into
      it. These large homes clearly don’t protect the historic and scenic
      values."
      Sawtooth National Forest supervisor Bill LeVere
      
      By GREG STAHL
      Express Staff Writer
      The Sawtooth National Recreation Area (SNRA) was
      established in 1972 primarily to check unbridled private land development
      in the Sawtooth Valley. The SNRA’s managers are now proposing to tighten
      those rules.
      The Sawtooth National Forest, which oversees management of
      the SNRA, has released for public review its revised building standards,
      in the form of an environmental assessment (EA. The original standards
      were adopted in 1974, and the current revision process began in 1996.
      Sawtooth National Forest supervisor Bill LeVere said the
      proposal is significantly different than the initial proposal made five
      years ago.
      "The primary reason for the changes is the input we
      have received from the public," he said. "We sincerely listened,
      took to heart the many ideas and suggestions, and made appropriate
      changes."
      The types of standards and guidelines under review include
      landscaping, building size, building location, architectural style, color,
      materials and fencing. The standards are similar to municipal planning and
      zoning design-review guidelines, LeVere said.
      "A shift in the size, type and design of buildings
      being proposed and constructed within the SNRA is occurring," the
      proposal states in a need-for-action statement. "Proposals are
      discussed or [are] being submitted for certification for house sizes
      double, triple or even four times the average house found within the SNRA
      today.
      "These house proposals are comparable to the estate
      homes found in resort areas in the West. Many of the proposals have modern
      elements and/or designs, which are insensitive to the visual setting and
      the history that helped lead to the creation of the Sawtooth National
      Recreation Area."
      The Forest Service drafted five alternatives for the
      public’s consideration, ranging from "no action," meaning the
      existing regulations would remain, to high restrictions, including a
      proposed 1,580-square-foot cap on building sizes.
      The Forest Service’s preferred alternative is
      alternative four, which provides "more detailed standards and
      guidelines related to use and development on private land," according
      to the proposal.
      "We’re trying to bring some common sense into
      it," LeVere said. "These large homes clearly don’t protect the
      historic and scenic values."
      Under alternative four, allowable building sizes would be
      based on a site’s proximity to a public corridor and the site’s
      terrain. A maximum of 5,000 square feet would be allowed for a non-visible
      lot that’s more than two miles from the nearest public corridor. A
      maximum of 1,800 square feet would be allowed for a lot in open sage or
      grassland that’s less than a quarter mile from a public corridor.
      Alternative four requires that facades visible to the
      public must be built in an architectural style compatible with the
      historic and scenic qualities on the SNRA, but allows non-visible facades
      to be designed with more leniency.
      "For example, on a non-visible portion of the
      structure…modern style architecture such as round towers, Gothic arches
      or Grecian columns may be certifiable," states the alternative.
      Colors and materials allowed on publicly visible facades
      must include logs, shakes, native stone, rough lumber or other
      contextually appropriate materials.
      According to the draft proposal, about 45 percent of the
      residences and outbuildings that could legally be built on the SNRA have
      been built.
      LeVere said the building standards are important because
      taxpayers have invested "tens of millions of dollars purchasing
      public rights" in the form of conservation easements in the SNRA.
      "Given these public rights, it is incumbent upon the
      Forest Service to appropriately and properly manage these rights for the
      American public."
      The Forest Service will hold open house meetings on the
      proposed building standards at SNRA headquarters, north of Ketchum, on
      Feb. 13 from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m.; at Sawtooth National Forest headquarters in
      Twin Falls on Feb. 12 from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m.; and at the Stanley Ranger
      Station on Feb. 14 from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m.