St. Lukes signs dispute on agenda
Two mounted crosses appear controversial
The two large Christian cross logos seem to be at the center of that
controversy.
By TRAVIS PURSER
Express Staff Writer
Courtesy Blaine County Planning and Zoning
St. Lukes is asking for an exception to a county ordinance so it can display two
corporate logos mounted nearly 40-feet high and backlit in blue on its new hospital. St.
Lukes also wants to build a large, brick sign for a medical office building P&Z
recently denied.
Planners for the new St. Lukes hospital south of Ketchum and the
Blaine County Planning and Zoning Commission tomorrow night are scheduled to revisit the
hospitals controversial 1998 signage plan.
Proposed signs include two 75-square-foot corporate logos constructed from
brushed aluminum, backlit in blue and mounted near the top of the buildings
40-foot-high south and east facing walls. Also proposed, is an emergency entrance marker
and several free-standing monument-like brick signs.
Hospital officials have said the signs are crucial to the safe and
efficient functioning of a hospital, but some say the signage plan is an offensive
corporate overstatement that ignores local aesthetic values.
The two large Christian cross logos seem to be at the center of that
controversy.
St. Lukes has made application for an exception to a county
ordinance, which allows one informational sign in conjunction with commercial or
industrial uses, provided the sign is no more than 20 square feet in area and is
indirectly lit or unlit.
Hospital planners propose 10 signs totaling 367 square feet around the new
medical complex. Many of the proposed signs would be made from translucent materials that
are backlit.
That plan represents a reduction of 50-square feet from the
hospitals 1998 plan.
The hospitals original construction application two years ago
included a section that called for 15 signs. But St. Lukes and the P&Z decided
to separate the signage issues for later consideration so that a timely decision on the
rest of the hospital application could be made.
With the hospital opening scheduled for early December, St. Lukes
officials are looking for a quick decision during tomorrow nights 6:30 p.m. meeting
in the old Blaine County Courthouse.
For P&Z commissioners to grant approval of the plan, St. Lukes
must show that an "undue hardship" exists because of site characteristics. And,
county rules specify the variance must not conflict with the public interest.
Because county rules allow only one 20-square-foot identification sign, an
eight-page staff report says, P&Z will need to determine what hardship exists for St.
Lukes before granting approval on the two 75-square-foot logos.
The cross logo, the report says, also appears in smaller form on six of
the other proposed signs.
One of the four monuments St. Lukes proposes pertains to a medical
office building. But because plans for that building were denied by P&Z this spring
and an appeal to that decision is still pending, county staff say the sign should be
disallowed. Because the building is not yet approved, no finding of undue hardship can be
made, the staff report says.
Just what future purpose the sign would serve in the event the appeal
fails is unclear.
St. Lukes written application says its five monument signs are
21-square-feet in size. Drawings for the signs, however, call for them to be housed in
nearly eight-foot-high, eight-foot-wide masonry structures with brick support columns and
tiled roofs. Sign lettering would appear in the center of the structure on blue Lexan
(like Plexiglas), with fluorescent interior illumination.
Another issue likely to come up is location of the hospital identification
monument. That sign is proposed to be in the public right of way, which county code
reserves for signs relating to traffic control.
Because a standard blue "H" sign will appear on the highway
north and south of the hospital, the county staff report recommends P&Z deny the
monument.