Wednesday, November 5, 2014

A golden opportunity for the Boulder-White Clouds


    For nearly two years, proponents of a massive national monument in Central Idaho, which would overlap the Boulder-White Clouds peaks in the Sawtooth National Recreation Area, have repeatedly declared there is no chance for enactment of legislation to congressionally designate these peaks as wilderness—designation even monument proponents acknowledge would grant the “gold standard” of environmental protection.
    Accordingly, proponents have focused on what they see as the next best alternative—creation of a national monument. But in October, Congressman Mike Simpson announced plans to reintroduce and strongly push his CIEDRA legislation early next year to congressionally designate the area as wilderness. Simpson’s decision rests on several things including expected changes in leadership of the House Resources Committee (where Rep. Rob Bishop, who is promoting wilderness legislation in northeastern Utah, will likely replace the current chair) and acknowledgement by Obama administration officials that congressional action, rather than a presidentially proclaimed national monument, is the best way to provide additional protection. The threat of problems arising from possible monument creation, particularly one overlapping the Boulder-White Clouds, should CIEDRA fail, also may help its passage. The cumulative impact of these and other changes significantly increase chances for CIEDRA’s success.
    The advantages of congressional wilderness designation versus a national monument are many. It provides a level of environmental protection a monument designation cannot achieve. It follows a well-known process with a predictable outcome in contrast to the uncertain process, outcome and timetable that a monument route involves. It avoids years of diversion of management resources, delays of critical decisions, confusion and possible litigation for the Sawtooth NRA involved in developing the multi-agency, multi-year management plan required for a national monument. And, in CIEDRA’s case, it incorporates over a decade of important input from Idaho stakeholders via numerous public hearings and meetings that Simpson conscientiously held in developing his proposal. Simpson has asked the administration for time to pursue enactment of CIEDRA before they make any final decision on creation of a national monument. This presents a unique opportunity in 2015 to “get it right” on meaningful further Boulder-White Clouds protection. Even those promoting a monument should recognize that supporting CIEDRA is consistent with providing the best permanent protection for the area. As a longtime supporter of CIEDRA, steadfastly committed to this approach even when others lost hope and shifted to the problematic national monument route, the Sawtooth Society hopes everyone who values this area’s unique natural qualities will unite to do everything possible to capitalize on a golden opportunity.
Paul Hill
President, Sawtooth Society




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2024 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.