Wednesday, November 5, 2014

ICL still supports monument process


By RICK JOHNSON


   In my Idaho Conservation League office in Boise, I have a copy of every version of Rep. Mike Simpson’s Central Idaho Economic Development and Recreation Act (CIEDRA). They start with the very first introduction of the bill in 2004 to the version now before Congress. There are little notes across the top from the congressman.
    “The beginning,” he wrote on the first one. “This is the one,” he wrote on the current version. On the year that it was introduced on the same day by all four members of the delegation—including our two current senators—he wrote, “All in!”
    We certainly never expected this stack of bills to be so deep, to cover so many years and to still be mired in one of the most dysfunctional eras of the U.S. Congress.
    No one has more respect than I do for the work of Rep. Simpson to protect the Boulder-White Clouds. I have been there for every step the whole time. I have seen a tremendous amount of work at great political risk, and I have also seen his personal depth of commitment to this special place grow profoundly.
    Mike Simpson is a legislator. He serves in Congress to do things, a rare trait these days. The fact that Simpson has stated his intent to move forward again with his Boulder-White Clouds bill should be no surprise. Confidence in the legislative process is in his DNA. I’d have been far more surprised if he stepped away.
    While he is a legislator, as the director of the Idaho Conservation League, I am a conservation advocate. Different jobs. Different tools.
    While the Idaho Conservation League applauds Simpson’s stated intent to move his bill forward in the new Congress, ICL’s experience gained over this long and winding trail suggests that the hill is too steep. We simply do not believe Congress can get it done, and we certainly don’t have signals from Idaho senators that they intend to help.
    Meanwhile, we have very strong signals from the Obama administration that a national monument process could result in many of the same protections and actually get the job done.
    We have several reasons for not changing course:

  •     First and most important, the only clear and the most viable path to secure permanent protection of this area is through a monument designation.
  •     Second, while honoring Simpson’s deep commitment to this place, we do not believe that the bill will pass Congress.
  •     Third, a strong coalition supports a national monument designation, which is the only reason that there is any prospect of congressional action.
  •     Fourth, as former governor and Interior Secretary Cecil Andrus said this past week, if the delegation wants to pass a bill, that’s fine, but the president should create the monument first to ensure that something gets done. Many of our greatest conservation treasures were created exactly this way.
  •     Finally, observers have cautioned us that delegation support of Simpson’s effort could be a delaying tactic to let the clock run out on the administration. I’m generally not that cynical, but after all we’ve seen take place over the years, it’s best to stay focused on what we can do to protect the Boulder-White Clouds.

    It’s time to get the job done, simple as that, and the monument would do it.


    Rick Johnson is the executive director of the nonprofit Idaho Conservation League, based in Boise.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2024 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.