Wednesday, August 20, 2014

County plans to put road levy back on ballot

May 2015 election date seems likely

Express Staff Writer

Buttercup Road, which runs from the north side of Hailey to the mid-valley, is one of the roads owned and maintained by Blaine County. Express file photo

    Blaine County voters will likely be asked again next May to approve a two-year property tax levy to help fund road and bridge maintenance.
    The Road and Bridge Department has been running a maintenance-funding deficit of $300,000 to $500,000 annually, and its reserve will be depleted this year. Due to a commissioners’ resolution passed in 2007, the county’s general fund money cannot be used for the Road and Bridge Department, and federal and state gas tax revenue has been declining.
    The department’s budget was cut a further $200,000 for fiscal year 2015.
    In a very low-turnout election last May, county voters narrowly defeated a proposed two-year levy of up to $5.24 million per year. The levy proceeds would have been shared with the county’s cities.
     During a meeting Tuesday, the commissioners agreed to place the matter before voters again, and discussed whether to do so this November or in May 2015. They agreed that a November date would bring out more voters, but decided that more time is needed to discuss the issue with city leaders and voters. To meet the deadline set by state code for a November ballot, the language would have to be finalized by the first week in September.
    “We want the public to understand exactly how the funds will be used,” Commissioner Larry Schoen said. “If we wait until May, it will provide us with a way to really engage with the public.”
    Commissioner Angenie McCleary said a May election would also give the county an opportunity to find out whether the Legislature will increase the state gas tax or provide another source of funding for road maintenance. However, she said, polls with legislators have indicated that any such action is unlikely.
    Commissioner Jacob Greenberg said the county should educate the public on its long-term plans for road and bridge funding.
    “We should take the time to decide what we need, how much it’s going to cost, where it will get us and whether it will be a sustainable level of funding,” he said.
    Greenberg said the county should minimize the level of funding requested, but not to the point that it has to go back to voters again soon with another proposed levy.
    Schoen disagreed, saying the deficit in road and bridge funding is probably a long-term situation.
    “I’m not going to say to somebody, ‘We’ll do this levy and we’ll hope that we won’t have to come back to you again,’” he said.
    Instead, he said, the county should show competence in managing the proceeds that it raises.
    To be placed on the May ballot, language for a proposed levy would have to be finalized by March.    McCleary said that time will pass quickly, and she suggested that the county begin discussions with the cities as soon as possible to determine whether they want to share in the levy proceeds, which would require a higher levy amount. Greenberg said he had heard from some voters who opposed the previous levy that the cities’ plans were too extravagant.
Greg Moore: gmoore@mtexpress

About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads

 Local Weather 
Search archives:

Copyright © 2020 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.