Wednesday, May 21, 2014

National monument not a good idea anymore


    I have supported the idea of a national monument designation for the Boulder-White Clouds because I felt that it would protect the wilderness values of such a large piece of land, something that people have been trying to protect for over 40 years.
    I expressed my support to the Blaine County commissioners in a letter this past February, and I was pleased to see in their final resolution to the president, supporting a national monument, that they put “protecting in perpetuity … above all, its wilderness qualities.”
    As the issue becomes more confused, with no specific reasons given as to why the part of the monument that overlaps the Sawtooth National Recreation Area needs extra protection, and with agreements between various groups on what trails might be open to mechanized (or mountain bike) travel, wilderness character and ecological values seem to be drifting away. The latest map and the agreement between the ICL and the Wilderness Society do not even address any of the concerns of motorized recreational users—will they be able to continue to use the roads and trails they use now?
    Access for recreational uses and for a widespread economic revitalization of this area seem to be gaining ground over a national monument’s set goals of “preserving and protecting objects of historic and scientific value,” which to my thinking would be the wild, unspoiled nature of the land and the watershed, and the increasingly endangered species of plants and animals that inhabit the higher elevations.
    Maybe we’re better off without a national monument designation at this time, and maybe we can hope for a change in Congress to bring about a future designation for at least part of this area as true wilderness.
Evelyn Phillips
Hailey

 




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2019 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.