Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Repair the process on the river park

    Creating a river park at Hulen Meadows has become a polarized issue with lots of distrust floating around. The reason stems from a flawed process. There could have been—and could still be—a better scenario based on my experience with the Forest Service.
    Early on, we always got beat up proposing projects based on our own ideas. The plan was set in stone from the get-go with no avenues for honest dialogue about what could or should happen. After many frustrating years, we shifted our philosophy and everything became much easier. We learned to talk to people well before we laid anything out. We would throw out ideas and offer genuine opportunities for public input and, if people didn’t like an idea, even if we did, we dropped it. People came to trust us and we were able to do a lot of things that were really important.
    Ketchum’s City Council has lost sight of the fact that it works for the people. So has the Bureau of Land Management. They have not offered proper opportunities up front for public input to shape this project. They have not asked everyone: What can we do to meet your needs with this large piece of land? What makes economic sense? What makes environmental sense?
    The BLM has relied from the start on Ketchum’s parameters for a river park, which include drilling a well that could affect Hulen Meadows, rather than putting it out for review by all who would be affected. It has overlooked the opportunity to sit down and talk to local residents and many others with serious concerns. Agreeing to a workable solution is hard and time-consuming. Saying “no” becomes easy when things are polarized. Can we repair the process on the River Park?
Butch Harper
Hulen Meadows
Blaine County

About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads

 Local Weather 
Search archives:

Copyright © 2020 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.