Wednesday, April 16, 2014

If SNRA isnít broke, donít try to fix it


By ORVAL HANSEN


    I am writing to express serious concerns about a proposal to designate via presidential proclamation a very large national monument in central Idaho encompassing a substantial portion of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area (SNRA) including the Boulder and White Cloud mountains. An overlay of a new national monument on an area like the SNRA that is already protected by law is virtually unprecedented. At a minimum, this suggests great care must be taken to avoid conflicting laws or regulations, the undermining of existing protections and serious confusion. The need for such an overlay should be clear and urgent.
    The SNRA was established more than 40 years ago under Public Law 92-400. I was privileged to join Idaho Sens. Frank Church and Len Jordan and Idaho Congressman Jim McClure in working for the enactment of the legislation. It was my bill, H.R. 6957,  that was signed into law by the president. The SNRA enjoyed strong bipartisan support in the Congress as well as among the public in Idaho and throughout the intermountain region. That support has broadened and deepened over more than four decades.


I am proud to have joined with countless others in creating and helping to preserve this magnificent natural heritage.


    The Forest Service moved promptly to implement the SNRA by acquiring, with the cooperation of the landowners, scenic easements to provide permanent protection for the area from unplanned and unsightly development.
    The SNRA is an area of unmatched scenic beauty. Often referred to as “Idaho’s Crown Jewel,” it has been well protected and preserved for the enjoyment of millions of visitors and residents who live, work and recreate there.
    Advocates of the national monument should provide prompt and detailed answers to two questions: First, what are the specific threats to the area that require protection? Second, which of these threats cannot be protected against under the existing authority of the SNRA with, if necessary, appropriate modifications to the applicable laws? The people and organizations most closely associated with the SNRA, those who would be most affected by the creation of a national monument in the area, have repeatedly asked these questions of proponents of the national monument. Sadly, to date no clear and convincing answers have been forthcoming. I am writing now in the hope that before giving any serious consideration to the national monument proposal you and appropriate members of your administration will insist on such answers.
    The proposed national monument, in overlaying nearly 40 percent of the SNRA, would create dangerous fragmentation of its management by dividing responsibility between two management plans, one for the national monument developed jointly by the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management and the other developed solely by the Forest Service. In addition, there are serious risks of inadvertent consequences from such an overlay, such as undermining existing protections and overloading the fragile high alpine and limited infrastructure and emergency services of the SNRA through increased visitation.
    This appears to fall within the category of projects where the advice, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” is applicable.
    I am proud to have joined with countless others in creating and helping to preserve this magnificent natural heritage for the enjoyment be future generations. We join in urging that careful consideration be given to any potential long term effects before any irreversible actions are taken.

    Editor’s note: The writer sent this letter to President Barack Obama last month.


    Orval Hansen is a former U.S. representative for Idaho’s 2nd  congressional district.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2019 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.