Wednesday, April 2, 2014

State is putting elk, hunting at risk


By JOHN CAYWOOD

    House Bill 431’s becoming law is another milestone in elk breeders’ legislative campaigns and gives Idaho another “worst and last.”
    Idaho’s chronic wasting disease preventions are now the lowest of neighboring states and provinces. Elected officials have wagered wild deer and elk pursued by over 200,000 hunters to save 60 or so elk ranchers about $20,000 in annual costs. The near party-line vote and governor’s signature strips the Idaho Department of Agriculture’s science-based testing from 100 percent of dead animals to 10 percent of the rancher’s choice. ISDA will inspect farms at five-year intervals rather than annually.    
    Chronic wasting disease is to deer and elk what mad cow disease is to humans. Contagious, incurable and fatal, spread from penned to wild deer and elk in 22 states and two provinces. Its effects make wolves a side issue. The disease spreads via animals and soil and is taken up by plants. Nebraska’s website explains, “CWD has been spread to many captive herds across North America by … transfer of CWD-infected animals.”  
    Hunting rights in Idaho’s constitution are meaningless if wild venison is unsafe for families to eat. During his 2006 campaign, now-Gov. Butch Otter called for dramatic new controls to protect the wild herds and increase public confidence and trust in the elk operations. The region’s weakest chronic wasting disease safety net indicates “Idaho values” place public interest and wildlife well below agriculture.  
    The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation recognized that H431 played Russian roulette with public wildlife, alerting its 7,000 Idaho members that “seeking to lower testing and inspection regulations for CWD [is] a threat to the health of Idaho’s wild, free-ranging elk herds.” The Idaho Sportsmens Caucus Advisory Council (www.idahoscac.org) shares the general public’s view that elk-shooting operations “are not hunts in any sense … the shooting of elk while inside escape-proof fenced enclosures is not only unethical and adverse to our hunting heritage but presents a grave danger to wild and free-ranging elk populations.” In 2006, both Gov. Jim Risch and gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brady recommended banning shooter ranches because of their well-documented risks and problems.  
    Idaho’s cervid industry doesn’t pay its way.  ISDA’s 2013 report states: “… the cervidae program has consistently experienced annual budget deficits. In response … program operations were discontinued on April 7.” Simply put, elk ranchers went unregulated last year despite public funding and disease risks. In 2013, $22,363 from elk license plates also subsidized ISDA oversight.  
    A 2011 report concluded that 106 ranch elk escaped to the wild, scores “found dead” went untested, rule violations happened without agency interdiction, and a bull from a CWD-infested Colorado farm simply vanished on an Idaho farm. Less than 10 shooter operations incurred nearly all rule violations.  ISDA Caine Veterinary Center’s failure to have 2005 CWD test records on several “wasting away” elk it received from the shooting farm with the CWD contact bull suggests a state blind eye to inconvenient facts.  
    Wisconsin’s 2006 CWD audit showed agencies spent $32.3 million, employed 58 staffers and paid snipers to shoot wild deer. Its digester processed 370,768 pounds of contaminated venison and hunters waited two months for test results before eating theirs. Wisconsin taxpayers will pay millions more dealing with CWD in future decades.     
    Why is Idaho risking cherished wildlife, outdoor tourism and great state expense for a small troubled industry that resists $23 tests on tame animals shot for $1,500 to $10,000 and guts science-based CWD protections of our public interest?


John Caywood lives in Boise.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2019 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.