Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Our responsibility in the White Clouds


    People in the Wood River Valley will have outsized influence on whether and how a national monument is established in the Boulders and White Clouds. I don’t live in the valley, but thanks to people who do and did I have come over 35 years to love the White Clouds and East Fork Salmon more than any place on earth. So I presume to offer my thoughts on the outsized responsibility that accompanies outsized influence.
    Most monument discussion I have heard so far starts with how it would, should or should not affect our uses of the area. Since our love for it starts with our use, this is natural, and important. But I think our core responsibility is to the waters, lands, wildlife, fish, forests, heights and natural cycles that are the Boulders and White Clouds.  

A national monument could protect the waters,
in the SNRA and entire East Fork,
which give birth to salmon and take them seaward.

    Many monument backers, including me, say we seek it to protect wilderness values. But in our legal and political lexicons, wilderness seems now mainly a term that contrasts and regulates human uses: here uses a and b are allowed, but not uses x and y. This is unfortunate—the word’s richness deserves better, but it seems to be true. So our core responsibility to the White Clouds may be better captured by Thoreau’s word: wildness. Wildness is the most unique, capacious and valuable attribute the waters, lands and life of the White Clouds create. We do not bestow this wildness—it is in the place and the parts whose mesh makes the place. But we can diminish its scope and depth and value.
     For me, the heart of that wildness is salmon and steelhead, since they arise from White Clouds waters and then annually ferry into the area sea-packaged nutrients that over millennia built many of its webs of life. Its salmon are now endangered with extinction, and thus so is this unreplaceable ferry of life and health into it. We short-timers do not really see the damage done by the loss of this fish-borne wildness the last 50 years, and so tend not to grasp the worse damage it will do in 100 or 200 years. But to establish a national monument of durable value to the place itself we must try.
    A national monument could protect the waters, in the SNRA and entire East Fork, which give birth to salmon and take them seaward. And while a monument cannot directly reduce the downstream dam mortalities that endanger White Clouds salmon with extinction, a monument could tell the story—to users and nearby residents, Idahoans and Americans—of these fish, how their ocean ferry builds the White Clouds, and the consequences to the place of their erasure.
    The salmon and steelhead whose valiant tatters inhabit the White Clouds are part of the farthest and highest migrating salmon group on earth. The SNRA and Sawtooth National Forest have never told this story, or told what their disappearance will do to the White Clouds over decades and centuries. A monument could remedy that. I think remedying it is more important to the White Clouds than any lines on maps or any set of uses.
    Salmon are not the only lens through which to seek the wild White Clouds, but they are the kind of lens most basic to it and its future. Baba Dioum, a Senegalese man, says “we will conserve only what we love, we will love only what we understand, and we will understand only what we are taught.” A Boulder-White Clouds National Monument, soundly keeled, will over time better protect its webs of wildness and better teach their stories and gifts to users, visitors, managers and neighbors. Our responsibility is to lay that keel.  

    Pat Ford helped found the Save Our Wild Salmon Coalition and then worked for it for 21 years. He is a former executive director of the Idaho Conservation League, and with Lynne Stone founded the Boulder-White Clouds Council in 1984. He lives in Boise.

About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads

 Local Weather 
Search archives:

Copyright © 2020 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.