Friday, February 7, 2014

Court action ‘corrosive’ to St. Luke’s


By DAVID C. PATE

    I think the early Idaho pioneers who founded St. Luke’s would be dismayed about recent federal decisions regarding the future of their prized creation. I also think their descendants who now own St. Luke’s, the state’s only locally owned and governed health system, will come to understand how corrosive the court action has been.
    I will set aside the significant confusion and errors of fact, particularly around costs, that have persisted throughout the course of the action. I want to focus on the community asset and facts that should concern every resident of our community.    
    From its beginnings at the turn of the 20th century as a frontier hospital, St. Luke’s has innovated for its communities. St. Luke’s started Idaho’s first open-heart surgery program and only children’s hospital. These two examples of many have meant high-quality care close to home.
    That’s not so unusual in bigger cities, but significant there are challenges to establish and maintain high-quality care in an area that doesn’t attract as many physicians and a nationwide physician shortage that only continues to get worse.
    The innovations have continued in recent years, with a multi-million-dollar electronic health records system, new outreach programs for critical health needs, and new approaches that approach health in an ongoing fashion, rather than isolated events to be treated or fixed.
    These things have been possible because of the ownership agreement St. Luke’s has with its communities. The communities own this asset; that is not true of any other health system in Idaho.
    St. Luke’s leaders and the boards of community members, among them our most respected business owners whose families have been Idaho residents for generations, have recognized for a long time that health care is unsustainable in its current form. We knew that it would require a huge financial investment and take years to accomplish. Your neighbors decided to transform health care on your behalf because it was the right thing to do.


St. Luke’s is not and has never been satisfied with the status quo.



    The judge who presided over the trial agrees.
    In his recent decision, Judge B. Lynn Winmill complimented us for our “foresight and vision.”
    It is unfortunate that some, who have been well served by the status quo, are so afraid of change that they have needed to provide misinformation and inaccuracies. We saw this in court; we have seen it in recent coverage.  
    The same thing could be said on a national level; one of the more overlooked aspects of the legal action was the way very old federal laws, developed for manufacturing and industries in population-dense parts of the country, conflict with newer laws designed to encourage the sorts of things St. Luke’s is trying to do.
    St. Luke’s is not and has never been satisfied with the status quo. Our relationship with Saltzer Medical Group was predicated on our mission: To improve the health of people in our region. Judge Winmill indicated that he was “convinced that it would have that effect if left intact, and St. Luke’s is to be applauded for its efforts to improve the delivery of health care in the Treasure Valley.”
    What health care and the insurance industry have done for decades has not solved our healthcare crisis. Why wouldn’t, why shouldn’t, an Idaho system lead us out of this mess?



    David C. Pate, M.D., J.D., is president and chief executive officer of St. Luke’s Health System.

 




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2019 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.