Friday, August 2, 2013

Keeping fair access to federal lands


By MIKE CRAPO

    I have long been a proponent of fair access to our public lands. Americans pay for the upkeep of our federal land assets and should not be shut out of benefitting from these resources through unnecessary restrictions and steep fees. This includes ensuring that cabin user fees on federal lands are administered fairly and reasonably. That is why I joined a bipartisan group of my colleagues in reintroducing legislation to help ensure the continuation of equitable access to our federal lands by addressing the rising cost of annual cabin user fees.  
    Almost a century ago, Congress enacted legislation enabling Americans to build recreational cabins on certain lots on federal land in exchange for an annual fee for use of the sites. Since that time, families have built cabins and passed on the tradition of recreating in our forests through generations. Nationwide, approximately 14,000 cabins are located on fee-based federal lots. This includes cabins in the Sawtooth National Forest, Caribou-Targhee National Forest and the Idaho Panhandle National Forest.
    These cabins add to the recreation opportunities on our federal lands that include hiking, camping, hunting, fishing, horseback riding, skiing, boating, using off-road vehicles and more. Unfortunately, massive increases in cabin user fees, due to problematic appraisals, have threatened the ability of families to keep their cabins.   
    In 2000, the Cabin User Fee Fairness Act (CUFFA) was enacted to implement a fair and consistent process for determining cabin user fees that takes into account the restrictions placed upon cabin owners and construct fees that reflect the market value of the residential lots. I was a part of the group in Congress that worked on these reforms, and have pressed the U.S. Forest Service to administer the fees according to congressional intent. However, cabin users continue to face rising fees due to challenges with appraisals accounting for the unique restrictions placed on cabin users in national forests.
    That is why I joined Sens. Jon Tester (D-Montana), Max Baucus (D-Montana), John Barrasso (R-Wyoming), Dianne Feinstein (D-California), Mike Enzi (R-Wyoming) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) in introducing the bipartisan Cabin Fee Act of 2013 that would establish an uncomplicated, equitable and predictable fee system and require new land appraisals to be completed within two years. The Cabin Fee Act would assign annual user fees according to an eleven-tier “cabin value” system ranging from $500 to $5,500. This system will provide greater certainty to cabin owners, but will not reduce the U.S. Forest Service’s revenue from cabin leasing. Similar legislation, introduced by Rep. Doc Hastings (R-Washington) and co-sponsored by Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), has advanced in the U.S. House of Representatives.
    The stated purpose of CUFFA is “to ensure, to the maximum extent praacticable, that the National Forest System recreation residence program is managed to preserve the opportunity for individual and family-oriented recreation.” Multiple use of public lands remains the most effective utilization of our natural resources, and families who utilize federal lands offer a valuable perspective on the effective management of our federal lands. There is no doubt that we have considerable challenges with federal land management. The more Americans who utilize our resources and understand their values create a greater understanding of the needs. To best ensure that Americans can benefit from our federal lands, we must maintain fair access to these public resources.


Mike Crapo, a Republican, is the senior U.S. senator from Idaho.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2024 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.