Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Committee discusses state takeover of federal lands

Some say plan would generate needed revenue


By GREG MOORE
Express Staff Writer

    A co-chair of a legislative committee studying the pros and cons of the state taking control of federal land in Idaho has a simple message for the public and his colleagues: Be patient.
    Sen. Chuck Winder, R-Boise, vowed that the Federal Lands Interim Committee will take its time to study all the angles, benefits and consequences of such a big idea. The first few meetings will be devoted to education before members turn their focus to a report and recommendation due to the Legislature in 2015.
    “These first few meetings will be more educational than anything else,’’ Winder said as part of his opening remarks at the panel’s first meeting Friday, Aug. 9.
    The committee is charged with following up on a resolution approved by lawmakers earlier this year demanding that the federal government cede most of the public land it oversees in Idaho to the state.
    A variety of federal agencies manage more than 53,000 square miles of forest, rangeland and in many cases roadless wilderness areas. That’s an area about the size of Arkansas.
    The U.S. Forest Service oversees the majority of that land, estimated at 32,000 square miles, followed by the BLM and a handful of other agencies.
    One motivation for a state takeover is generating additional revenue for the state. Officials with the Idaho Department of Lands told the panel Friday that the state could receive between $50 million and $75 million in revenue annually for public schools, universities and other institutions by allowing more timber harvest and other activities.
    During the daylong meeting, lawmakers heard competing versions of history and legal theory on the idea of federal transfer of public lands to states.
    Donald Kochan, a law professor at Chapman University in California, said critics of federal transfer are too quick to dismiss the government’s implied promise to dispose of all of its federal lands as part of compacts written when Western states were created.
    Kochan, an advocate of federal transfer of lands, said more study is needed to determine how the Idaho delegates at the time of statehood viewed the compact and any handover of federal acreage.
    But Idaho Assistant Attorney General Steve Strack said the delegates and state leaders at the time were clear on that question. Strack cited multiple references in which delegates referred to the more than 3 million acres of federal lands that were deeded into state trust lands for schools as “grants.’’
    Delegates also supported the establishment of forest reserves, which permanently placed the land under federal control. Judge William Claggett, the chief architect of the Idaho Constitution, also drafted the law that created Yellowstone National Park, Strack said.
    “I do not suppose for a moment that we would ever have control over the public lands of the United States,’’ said delegate Weldon Heyburn, of Wallace, at the time of statehood.
    The resolutions passed earlier this year had wide support among the Republican-dominated Legislature. But the idea also has critics, including Sen. Michelle Stennett, D-Ketchum, one of two Democrats on the committee.
    “Mostly I was on it to ask the hard questions,” Stennett said. “There’s so much more about what it takes to manage these lands. We at the state just don’t have the financial ability to do it at the level the federal government does.
    “I walked into this thinking it’s not a smart idea at all, and I haven’t moved off of that.”
    Stennett predicted that if the state does manage to take over federal lands—a move that she said would be an unconstitutional violation of federal preemption—it would soon be financially compelled to sell much of the acreage to private buyers.
    “We would lose access for the public,” she said. “I think that in the end, public discontent might decide this more than anything.”
    The committee is scheduled to meet twice again this year, in late October and in early December.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2019 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.