Wednesday, August 29, 2012

County to seek nursing-home proposals

Commissioners discuss objective analysis


By KATHERINE WUTZ
Express Staff Writer

Express file photo The Blaine Manor skilled-nursing facility in Hailey is currently being subsidized by county taxpayers.

Blaine County commissioners on Tuesday polished a request for proposals to build skilled-nursing facilities, emphasizing that any new facility must be able to support itself in the long term without taxpayer subsidies.

In May, the county had issued a request for information from the 79 state skilled-nursing facilities and from the Croy Canyon Ranch Foundation, asking them for suggestions on what a successful skilled nursing care model could look like in Blaine County. 

The county received three responses: one from Pocatello-based Safe Haven Health Care, which was already planning to build a private facility in Bellevue, one from Pocatello-based TanaBell Health Services, which would take over management of Blaine Manor and split profits or losses with the county, and one from the Croy Canyon Ranch Foundation, which envisioned a tiered-care facility owned by a nonprofit corporation, but which would require a 35-year $29.5 million general obligation bond.

County Administrator Derek Voss said during the meeting that a request for proposals is more formal, and would provide more detail regarding the organizations’ plans for the county specifically and allow the county to more clearly evaluate the alternatives.

The request for proposals asks the organization to provide the business plan for its current facilities, a business plan outline for a proposed facility in Blaine County, short- and long-term financial goals and the extent and type of county support needed.


“If you get to the end of this and
you get the right numerical answer,
but it’s the wrong answer, we don’t
want to lock you in.”
Derek Voss
Blaine County administrator


The proposals would then be evaluated based on criteria such as how well the evaluators feel the proposed facility would provide safe and compassionate senior care, how successful the facility is likely to be without county support in the near and distant future and how well the facility would be able to provide care for those on Medicare and Medicaid.

The proposals would be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 on how well they can meet 10 criteria, scores that would then be weighted based on how important the board feels each criterion is.

Voss said that process would allow the commissioners a more objective basis for determining a potential choice for a senior care provider.

“It’s a good process, it’s used often, and we’re not inventing anything new here,” he said.

Commissioner Larry Schoen likened the process to that of hiring someone for a management position. He said that even though there is likely to be a numerical winner, that doesn’t mean the highest score will be the best choice.

“This would guide us to a pool of candidates that are qualified to meet the county’s needs and wants, but who are offering that in slightly different ways,” he said. “I’m not saying it will be clean and tidy, but ultimately the decision [on which proposal is best] rests with the board.”

Voss said the proposals will also undergo a risk analysis before the commissioners accept any proposal and work toward an agreement. And, he added, the commissioners are not under any obligation to accept the highest-scoring proposal.

“If you get to the end of this and you get the right numerical answer, but it’s the wrong answer, we don’t want to lock you in,” he said. “The board has to be able to say, ‘Thank you, but that won’t work for us.’”

The board is putting the final touches on the request and will finalize the document at next Tuesday’s meeting. The commissioners will also discuss who will evaluate the proposals.


Kate Wutz: kwutz@mtexpress.com




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2020 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.