Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Council should stand by Quigley vote


The question arises, where were Councilwomen Carol Brown and Martha Burke during the past three years during the hearings for the Quigley project? Was the Hailey community's rejection of this application not clear enough for these two ladies, or was their refusal to this annexation request arrived at in a vacuum?

If the city of Hailey was not in a financial position to annex the proposed development a month ago, then what has changed by today that makes reopening this closed issue possible?

The application process for this project has worked, even though it was a drawn-out process and ultimately did not turn out in the developer's favor. The final decision, after all this time, was based on the city's planning staff recommendation to reject this project, and the community's clear antagonism toward the project and its annexation.

The developer has shown not to be as community-oriented as he had presented himself during the hearings. His response to the rejection of his project was the closing of a trail along the edge of his property that had been used for decades as a hiking trail by the community. Mayor Haemmerle's observation that philanthropy doesn't ask for something in return was appropriate under the circumstance.

This development and its annexation request will at this time not serve the city's best interests. The council should stand on its decision to disallow it and unanimously vote against entertaining any continuation of the rejected application.

George Horvath

Hailey




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2020 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.