Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Why the firefighters’ lawsuit? Wish we knew


By RANDY HALL

Why is an international firefighters union suing the city of Ketchum? I wish I knew.

What I do know is that the union's accusations are preposterous, and the city has a duty to its citizens to set the record straight.

The major issue appears to be the city's employment "at-will" policy, which the union says it cannot accept. The dismissal "for cause" provision that the union demands is the sort of policy that has contributed to putting many cities throughout the country on the verge of bankruptcy.

Ketchum's "at-will" provision is not only in the city's financial best interest but also is clearly the city's right under the Idaho Constitution. I feel obligated to treat all city employees equally. It is unfair to give benefits to one department that cannot be given to all.

The city's eight full-time firefighters and 39 volunteers are dedicated individuals who make great personal and family sacrifices to protect and serve our community. I know. I spent five years as a member of this department. We owe them our respect and the best working conditions possible.

So why, rather than come to us in 2009 with their concerns, did the eight full-time firefighters choose to unionize? I remain convinced that had they spoken to us first, their issues would have been resolved long ago without lawyers and tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars.

  Why, too, are out-of-town union officials making inflammatory and false statements that cloud the issues?

For example, the union has asked that the city be held in contempt of court for refusing to meet. This makes no sense. Although we do not believe the city is legally required to meet again at this point, we have sent the union two letters offering to meet on six different dates. The union so far has not responded—except with the contempt motion.

The union questions changes to the city employment handbook. That also makes no sense. The City Council resolution specifically exempted the firefighters when it approved the changes.

Union officials have grossly overstated the city's legal costs, giving a figure almost four times higher than the actual costs. They also neglected to note that the union requested many of the procedures that have increased city costs.

Other actions create doubt and suspicion. For example, the union was responsible for recording the contract negotiations and fact-finding commission meetings. All the tapes from the fact-finding commission are missing and many statements from the contract negotiations that support the city's position have been transcribed as "inaudible."

Also disturbing are the anonymous letters sent to my family and the family of the fire chief. These letters were printed from within the fire station. This harassment is reprehensible and contributes to an atmosphere of distrust.

So, what's next? The city believes that employment must be "at-will," but the union says it will not accept such a provision. The city believes this constitutes an impasse; the union says it does not.

Because there is relatively little case law on union negotiations with public agencies in Idaho, the city has asked the Idaho Supreme Court to review the case.

As we wait for the court's decision, we remain committed to reaching an agreement that will be good for the city, all of our employees and, most importantly, the citizens of Ketchum.

Randy Hall is mayor of Ketchum.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2019 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.