Wednesday, May 30, 2012

School district should explain what went wrong


The Blaine County School District board of trustees owes the community an explanation about what led to the dueling lawsuits filed between the district and Seattle Engineering firm McKinstry Essention over projects costing $26 million.

These are more than garden-variety lawsuits over billing squabbles because of how the projects, which included geothermal heating and air conditioning retrofits on eight schools and other facilities, were funded.

In 2009, just a year after the near-collapse of the nation's financial system, Blaine County voters approved a whopping $59.8 million plant facilities levy that should have been a win-win for local workers and schools. Workers stood to gain employment opportunities they otherwise wouldn't have had in the recession that had overwhelmed the construction trades. The district stood not only to get its school buildings improved, but to avoid being forced to shift money from teachers' salaries and education programs in order to afford repairs.

Many taxpayers cast counterintuitive votes to invest in the local economy and to keep the schools strong instead of hunkering down and pinching pennies until the storm of the recession passed. They dug deep to do the right thing.

Now, with the district embroiled in what threatens to be an expensive legal brawl, taxpayers are wondering if they really did do the right thing. Filed after mediation between the district and the engineering firm failed, the lawsuits turned win-win into certain win-lose.

What happened?

In July 2011, representatives of the district and McKinstry were all smiles and handshakes in a meeting where they reported on the number of local subcontractors that had worked on the projects. In a December 2011 meeting when subcontractors worried aloud about getting paid, the district assured them that all was well.

But five months later, the district is demanding that McKinstry give back the $18 million spent to date. McKinstry wants the district to pay it $7 million more for its work. And what does the contract between them say and what does it mean? That's what the lawyers will do battle over.

All these matters are details, albeit expensive ones. The real question is how did it come to this?

The district downplayed its lawsuit when it characterized the dispute as one over a "discrepancy"—a gross understatement to say the least.

The public deserves an explanation that's outside of the legal documents, outside of lawyers' argument and beyond any backroom settlement of the cases about what went wrong. Without it, the trust that taxpayers placed in the district may become damaged beyond repair.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2020 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.