Friday, February 17, 2012

MOD debate remains unresolved

Commissioners urge ‘conservative’ and ‘reasonable’ approach


By KATHERINE WUTZ
Express Staff Writer


The white-shaded area above shows the area known as the Cold Springs Bench, a 40-acre piece of land behind St. Luke’s Wood River. County Commissioner Tom Bowman has suggested removing the area from the Mountain Overlay District, which would open the parcel for development. Express graphic by Erik Ellison

Debate over considered changes to Blaine County's Mountain Overlay District heated up again Tuesday, as the benefits of pristine hillsides were pitted against the benefits of affordable housing.

The Mountain Overlay District is an area that the county has determined to be unsuitable for development due to the land's steep slope.

The district was defined by former county Planner Jeff Adams using computer-mapping software. However, the software was not accurate to a fault, and in setting the district boundary it divided property lines and included flat areas that could be safely developed.

The county commissioners set out to fix those flaws in December, and continued discussing which of 41 sites should be removed from the district and why.

Debate over one such area, the Cold Springs Bench behind the hospital, has characterized the discussions over the district so far.

Former County Commissioner Len Harlig said last month that the 40-acre property was deliberately included in the district when it was created in 1991 for a number of reasons, including emergency access.

During a county commissioners meeting Tuesday, Planning and Zoning Commissioner Lili Simpson said she agreed, as the original text ordinance clearly urges Blaine County not to create a "patchwork" of developable areas and undevelopable areas across the valley's hillsides. The district has worked so far, she said, to prevent that from happening.

"When we look up there, we look at it as a whole, a visual whole," she said. "That word, patchwork, is indicative of what we are not to create."

Julie Cord, a representative of a property owner on the bench, said opening the Cold Springs Bench to development would not violate the spirit of the ordinance at all. She said the property she represents is 68 acres total, but only 13 acres of it would be excluded from the district if the bench is opened.

"It's not a hillside," she said. "There's no slope. It's flat as a pancake."

Cord, like many other members of the public, said she supported the hillside ordinance and its intent to keep development off scenic slopes. But opening the bench wouldn't ruin the scenery, she said.

"Nothing is going to be built on the hillside," she said. "I don't want to see houses all over the hills either. I don't think anyone in this room wants that."

But, she continued, development on the bench would not be on a hillside and could provide much-needed affordable housing in the valley.

Again, no decisions were made at the county's Tuesday meeting, despite lengthy public comment and a comment from County Commissioner Angenie McCleary that she hoped to see as "conservative" a district as possible. Fellow Commissioner Tom Bowman said he agreed, but only to a degree.

"I want to be conservative, too, but I want to be reasonable," he said.

Bowman is the commissioner who recommended exclusion of the bench from the district, despite a Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation to the contrary.

The meeting has been continued to 2 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 21, at the old Blaine County Courthouse in Hailey.

Katherine Wutz: kwutz@mtexpress.com




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2024 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.