Friday, February 3, 2012

Wolf hunt numbers up; state wants them higher

Wildlife officials say further control needed


By KATHERINE WUTZ
Express Staff Writer

Idaho Department of Fish and Game officials say they are "encouraged" by the state's wolf harvest so far, but further control actions may be needed to keep elk populations up in parts of the state.

Hunters and trappers have killed 266 wolves this season, far more than 187 killed during Idaho's first wolf hunt in 2009-10. Due to litigation, there was no hunt last year.

Twenty-two of the wolves killed this year were taken in the Southern Mountains zone, which encompasses Ketchum, Sun Valley and Hailey.

Department Deputy Director Jim Unsworth said the agency is still worried about wolves in the Lolo zone in northern Idaho.

"We are still having excess mortality on cow elk up there," Unsworth said. "We need to reduce wolf populations."

Cow and calf mortality rates in that region stand at roughly 20 percent, most of which has been from wolf predation, Unsworth said. He said he'd like to reduce that rate to 10 percent from all causes, including other predators such as mountain lions.

To reach that goal, Unsworth said Fish and Game would contract with U.S. Wildlife Services for control actions this spring—including gunning wolves from federal helicopters.

Garrick Dutcher, program manager for wolf advocacy group Living With Wolves, said the control actions might not have the desired effect. Dutcher argued that predator populations respond to prey populations, rather than the other way around. In other words, fewer wolves doesn't mean more elk.

In Yellowstone National Park, a reintroduced population of wolves grew rapidly as it fed on an "out-of-control" elk population.

"In the park, the wolf population peaked at 174," he said. "Now it's down to 90-something. Now that they have picked off all the easy elk, the wolf population has leveled out."

<

Unsworth said that while that may be true, Idaho's situation is more complicated. For one thing, national park regulations prohibit hunting, and finding a predator-prey balance in a hunted system is more difficult.

"This idea of let nature take its course, it's compelling to think it, but it's hard to find real examples," he said. "In an unhunted system, you could see some balance, but [Idaho is] not an unmanaged system like Yellowstone. We have goals, and it's quite different from a national park."

Other methods, such as controlled burns to improve elk habitat, have been used to boost elk populations in the Lolo zone, Unsworth said. But the problem of predator-caused mortality still remains, causing a problem for populations that the agency is trying to boost.

"Prey populations can respond to a variety of things, from habitat to predators," he said. "Any time you have excessive mortality for something you want to manage for more of, we manipulate mortality rates."

Dutcher said hunts and control actions could help reduce elk depredation, but only because of damage to pack structure. In a breeding pack where all but three adults are killed, at least one wolf will need to stay and watch the pack's pups while the other two hunt.

"It's going to be difficult for one or two wolves to hunt big game, like elk," Dutcher said. "These wolves are going to seek other sources of food, which could put them into conflict with livestock producers."

Dutcher said wolf populations could withstand "culling" of up to 40 percent of a total population, biologically speaking. But as wolves pass on knowledge through generations, pack culture may be damaged at much lower kill rates.

"Den sites and rendezvous sites and hunting strategies for game are all parts of the body of knowledge passed on generationally," he said. "When anything above 15 to 20 percent culling occurs, that culture of knowledge starts to be lost. And once it's gone, it's gone for good."

Katherine Wutz: kwutz@mtexpress.com




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2019 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.