Friday, October 28, 2011

Not ours to lose


In the earliest days of the Cold War, Democrats were accused quite effectively by the Republicans of losing China to the communists, as though China was ours to lose. The fact that those communists were Chinese citizens fighting for control of their own lives and that Americans did not live in that huge country did not dissuade those who believed we should be able to simply impose our will on the rest of the world.

President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hilary Clinton are instituting a new, reality-based foreign policy. In this new philosophy, other countries, including Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, are not ours to win or lose.

Sometimes in foreign affairs, answers are clear. Executing Osama bin Laden is a yes; invading a country because we don't like their leader is a no.

Sometimes answers are not so clear.

For example, use of American power to try to stop genocide in Sudan is a maybe, but how? Mostly, the answers aren't really ours in the first place.

The U.S., at the request of the Libyans themselves, prevented Muammar Gaddafi from using air power to flatten the uprising of his own people. We did not decide whether to start that rebellion in the first place. We cannot determine what will follow its end because America does not own the results, Libya does.

It is not a sign of failure, but of success, that we don't know the eventual outcome of the nation-building that will now go on in Libya, or in Egypt or Tunisia. The only way we could know is if we were to impose U.S. answers on another country.

If we learned anything from the nonsensical notion that America could lose China, it should be that this approach was both morally wrong and practically ineffective.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2020 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.