Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Sloppy editing


My letter was edited (re-written) incorrectly and a reference was left off. The Wilderness Act was not "amended" to ban bicycles. Rather it was re-interpreted in order to ban bicycles. This is fully explained in this reference: http://www.imba.com/resources/wilderness/stroll.pdf. It is a legal opinion by Theodore J. Stroll, a Judicial Staff Attorney of the California Supreme Court. His argument cannot be reduced to a "sound bite" or short comment so I advise downloading it and reading the whole thing. He suggests, among other things, that the use of fishing tackle could be called mechanized transport of game.

"Its hallowed status is enhanced by the fact that, except for a trivial modification in 1978, it has never been amended, although new areas are regularly added to the Wilderness inventory under separate pieces of legislation," Stroll writes.

Interpretation and amending are two entirely different things.

Arne P. Ryason

Hailey

Editor's note: The Express regrets the error.




 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2019 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.