Martha Stewart: pipsqueak liar
Opinion by Pat Murphy
When Judge Miriam Cedarbaum scolded the
doyenne of decor, Martha Stewart, that "lying to government investigators is a
very serious matter," I thought of Thomas Scully and his whopper.
Stewart lied about cashing in stock. But
Scully lied to 535 members of Congress and the entire nation and got away with
it.
As President Bush’s head of Medicare,
Scully ordered office actuary Richard Foster to chop $100 billion--billion!--off
cost estimates. Refuse and you’re fired, Scully told Foster.
So, instead of the $500 billion to $600
billion Medicare will cost over 10 years, the White House told Congress it would
cost $400 billion.
Congress believed the White House, just as
it took Bush’s word about weapons of mass destruction when approving the attack
on Iraq.
When Scully’s duplicity was unmasked, Bush
quickly hurried him out the back door--and into a cushy six-figure lobbying job
with the health care industry that Scully policed.
If anyone expected a $100 billion lie to
Congress to be punishable, surprise. The Bush administration, which surely
okayed a $100 billion falsehood, says Scully may have been, well, unethical (!)
but not "illegal" in strong-arming a subordinate to cook the books.
Of course, that’s a crime elsewhere.
Auditing firm executives have been criminally charged for withholding financial
data. Enron brass and other executives face prison for forging books to create
false profits.
Deception has become a virtue in a White
House that promotes "values" as its theme. How delicious this irony: the
Pentagon was burned by an ex-Marine, Gary Lakis, who was awarded a $66 million
security training contract because he claimed to have "combat decorations and
experience." Alas, he lied: no combat and no decorations.
Truth around the Bush administration is
punishable. U.S. Parks Police Chief Teresa Chambers was fired by the Interior
department for publicly acknowledging she was under funded. Treasury secretary
Paul O’Neill was booted for the truth about the reckless tax cuts.
Which raises the question: Where are
self-righteous congressional crusaders who unleashed investigators on Bill
Clinton for lies about oral sex and were so quick to impeach him?
Is there nothing wrong about a $100
billion lie distorting the budget? Or going to war because of false information?
Or a White House memo breaching the Geneva Conventions for humane treatment of
prisoners? Or ladling out multi-billion dollar no-bid contracts to cronies? Or
hiding enemy detainees from the International Red Cross?
Repeatedly lying to Congress and skirting
the law could be misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance. But no Republican
apparently has the stomach to investigate a president who invokes God’s name,
controls the executive and legislative branches with an iron hand and owes his
incumbency to the third, the judiciary.