Roadless areas rule could be overturned
Bush administration proposes to empower
governors on management
To get involved:
Written comments will be taken for 60
days. Mail comments to: Content Analysis Team, Attn: Roadless State
Petitions, USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 221090, Salt Lake City, UT 84122.
Fax comments to (801) 517-1014.
E-mail comments to:
statepetitionroadless@fs.fed.us
By GREG STAHL
Express Staff Writer
Under a Bush administration plan released
this week, state governors could be empowered on federal public lands issues
like logging, road building and road-free area protection.
At the Idaho state capitol on Monday,
Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman joined Sen. Larry Craig and Gov. Dirk
Kempthorne to announce the proposed rule, which would replace the Clinton
administration’s 2001 road-building ban in road-free portions of national
forests.
Of the 48 contiguous states, Idaho has the
most at stake. Idaho has 9.3 million acres of road-free federal land, about 17
percent of the state. Idaho also filed the first of nine lawsuits challenging
the Clinton era regulations.
Kempthorne, who orchestrated the filing of
the state’s lawsuit, said he was pleased with the new proposal.
"I never disagreed with the concept that
some federal lands in Idaho should be designated as roadless areas," he said.
"But when the previous administration tried to implement their rule in 2001, it
ignored the sovereign states and denied us any input into the process."
But supporters of Clinton’s road-free
policy said the new proposal ignores the general public’s overwhelming show of
support for the 2001 policy.
In drafting the original road-free policy,
the Forest Service held two rounds of public hearings. Seven federal agencies
collaborated. More than 180 Native American groups were consulted. More than 600
public meetings were held nationwide, and an estimated 25,000 people attended.
The Forest Service received about 500,000 favorable comments on the initial
proposal and 1.1 million favorable comments on the final proposal.
The Clinton rule supporters also said the
Bush administration is continuing to play politics with anything attached to the
name of former President Bill Clinton, a political whipping boy for the right
wing.
"Folks pretty clearly said they wanted
roadless areas undeveloped," said Craig Gehrke, Idaho director of The Wilderness
Society. "It’s being driven by a lot of politics. They’ll deny that, but from
our standpoint, this is much different from what we originally had."
Idaho Conservation League Forest
Specialist John Robison reiterated that Americans have already spoken very
clearly on the issue.
"Now, with no public process whatsoever,
this administration is preparing to hand these special places over to the
logging and mining corporations," he said.
The new proposal would allow governors to
petition the U.S. Forest Service to establish road-free rules within their
borders. The proposals would be developed in cooperation with the Forest Service
and be subject to the approval of a regional forester.
The process would allow governors to
propose opening road-free areas to logging, mining, oil or gas development. It
would also allow governors to recommend designating road-free areas as
wilderness.
The proposed rule will be published in the
Federal Register this week, and there will be a 60-day comment period before a
final rule is issued after the Forest Service evaluates public comments.
Western Republicans and Bush
administration officials announced Monday their satisfaction with the new,
proposed rule.
"Strong state and federal cooperation in
the management of roadless areas will foster improved local involvement in the
process," Veneman said.
Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo is on board, too.
"This new roadless initiative begins with
a much stronger chance to succeed because it offers local input and suggestions
from stakeholders, land use managers, local elected officials and state
leaders," he said. "Collaborative efforts closest to the ground are the key to
wise public lands management and eliminating gridlock."
Craig was sure to mention the contrast
between the two administrations.
"The Bush administration is wiping the
slate clean and erasing Clinton’s legacy of locking up our land," he said. "The
Clinton roadless rule further polarized the public land debate, with the only
benefactors being the fundraisers of environmental groups."